Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama Administration Asks Supreme Court to Dismiss ACLU Challenge to Warrantless Wiretapping Law! [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)48. It is YOU who needs the class in Civics.
You said:[font color=red]
"It's the DoJ's job to ask the court to dismiss a suit. It doesn't matter what the challenge is, the lawyers on the other side of the challenge will always ask for a petition/charge to be dismissed. "[/font]
This is a FALSE statement.
I supplied proof above that you attempted to discredit with unfounded snark.
Here is another example.
"AG Holder: DOJ Wont Defend a Challenge to DOMA Brought by Members of Military.
"Attorney General Eric Holder sent House Speaker John Boehner a letter today to inform him that the Department of Justice will not defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in a challenge brought by current and former active duty members of the United States military. In the lawsuit, the litigants seek various federal benefits for their same -sex spouses medical and dental insurance, basic housing allowances, visitation rights in military hospitals and survivor benefits."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1002&pid=329348
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1002&pid=329348
As shown above, the Department of Justice has discretion about WHAT they will defend,
and what they will let go,
AND the DoJ uses this discretion frequently.
Asking the Supreme Court not to hear the ACLU Challenge is NOT simply routine,
or "their job" as you would have people believe.
It clearly demonstrates an issue that is important to the Obama Administration.
They are choosing to defend what they see as their right to spy on Americans without a warrant,
and to shield the Telecoms from any consequences for violation of the 4th Amendment.
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama Administration Asks Supreme Court to Dismiss ACLU Challenge to Warrantless Wiretapping Law! [View all]
Better Believe It
Feb 2012
OP
True but since our rights are surrendered for us and sometimes done so covertly
TheKentuckian
Feb 2012
#4
Heh, even Saint Dennis Kucinich voted for H. J. Res. 64 which enabled warrentless wiretapping.
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#16
Do you seek out negative Obama/Democrat articles or are they sent to you?
great white snark
Feb 2012
#13
Maybe he is just looking for pro-democracy and pro-civil rights articles.
AnotherMcIntosh
Feb 2012
#15
Do you have an opinion on the article or would you rather engage in drive-by personal attacks?
Better Believe It
Feb 2012
#17
What if the ACLU lost this case? Wouldn't it then become permanent as opposed to the possibility
FarLeftFist
Feb 2012
#18
Doesn't have anything to do with liberalism. That's besides the point anyway.
FarLeftFist
Feb 2012
#26
Yeah, the conservatives are going to come down hard against a warrantless wiretapping bill..
Fumesucker
Feb 2012
#45
I thought this has been litigated during the Bush era already. BTW, the White House doesn't...
Honeycombe8
Feb 2012
#22
Remember how everyone was upset when Bush/Cheney got Republicans hired into the DOJ....
Honeycombe8
Feb 2012
#27
Right and the POTUS gains nothing by simply having the DOJ roll over on the case
treestar
Feb 2012
#41
Everybody knows the ACLU is jampacked with troublemaking "professional leftists".
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2012
#32
They want selective justice. If a Republican didn't challenge some despotic law...
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#47