Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The helical model - our solar system is a vortex (our Galaxy, too) [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)31. Even dictionaries can be wrong when they give an uneducated definition of a scientific term.
Theories do not make new facts. They do not create facts. Theories are not facts.
Many people use the word "theory" when the word "hypothesis" should be used.
Dictionaries frequently give definitions that are those use sloppily by the majority of people. However, this thread is not about "theory" as a term in every day conversation but about the scientific term "theory".
Newton's Theory of Gravitation is a well-established theory (as a sub-case of Einstein's relativistic Theory of Gravitation), but it is not a fact. It explains the facts.
On the other hand, do not pretend Newton's theory is conjectural enough to subject it to experimentation by walking out of a tenth-story window.
You propose a theory and look for supporting facts, don't find any then your theory is wrong and you start over. I thought this process was well known. I guess they don't teach it anymore.
They don't teach that anymore because that is dead wrong.
Scientists do not look for facts to support theories. Scientists look for facts that disprove theories.
Pseudo-scientists like creationists and "intelligent design" followers look for facts that support their theories and ignore facts that disprove them.
"A man should never be ashamed to own that he has been in the wrong, which is but saying in other words that he is wiser today than he was yesterday." -- Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The helical model - our solar system is a vortex (our Galaxy, too) [View all]
RandiFan1290
Jul 2013
OP
not just wrong and not just superficially; it’s deeply wrong, based on a very wrong premise
leftyohiolib
Jul 2013
#6
not quite - 26,000 years is the earth's precession cycle, 240 million to go around the galaxy
Baclava
Jul 2013
#9
The video and Bhat's theory are utter junk. Disproved, debunked, demolished.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#16
I don't doubt that the theory presented by Sadhu's videos are wrong. And yes I do consider
A Simple Game
Jul 2013
#19
Sure, start with a hypothesis. Their hypothesis has been shot down, disproved, destroyed, demolished
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#24
Not what I was looking for but you knew that didn't you. Thanks anyway. n/t
A Simple Game
Jul 2013
#30
Even dictionaries can be wrong when they give an uneducated definition of a scientific term.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#31
Perhaps hypothesis would be a better word for the beginning of what I am describing.
A Simple Game
Jul 2013
#32
No, the problem was the viedo maker misused the word 'vortex' the first time round
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#17
My point is that if it is indeed a decaying orbit then it is in all actuality a vortex.
A Simple Game
Jul 2013
#18
'ahead' as in 'ahead of the motion of the sun round the galactic centre'
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#20
I have no doubts that Sadhu's theory is wrong. I just find it interesting.
A Simple Game
Jul 2013
#21
But there are things like the 2nd video's invocation of 'precession', which is totally wrong
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#22
I have no faith in your understanding of scientific facts and the scientific method.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#26
"Decaying orbit" has nothing to do with a "vortex" other than shape.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#25