General Discussion

Dokkie

(1,688 posts)

19. Lol

Sun Feb 19, 2012, 09:45 PM

Feb 2012

Are you trying to imply that am pro life? I am so pro choice it would make your head spin. Personally I think a woman has the right to abort even after the baby is born(in cases of severe deformity). The fact that contraception stops the creation of a potential child is not in doubt and a church or institution who is against it shouldn't be made to pay for it. On the other had non catholic women who work for said institution should be allowed( as it is now) to use the income from those institution to pay for contraception.

Just so you understand me clearly, a woman or man should be allowed to buy whatever they want in the case contraception with his/her income and an institution who is opposed to it should also be free not to cover for said practice in their health insurance. Not saying this because I am catholic because at this point I am only going to church to make my parents happy.

I love to see your reply now

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why are taxpayers paying for Viagra? Where is the Catholic hierarchy's outrage about this? [View all] shcrane71 Feb 2012 OP

Totally agree! cpamomfromtexas Feb 2012 #1

This is outrageous. proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #2

Because men need to be able to get it up justiceischeap Feb 2012 #3

They need it to deal with alter boys. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #4

I keep seeing the contraceptions vs. Viagra comparisons customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #5

The lack of co-pay is a red herring jeff47 Feb 2012 #6

Perhaps you could answer my question customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #8

I already answered your questions. jeff47 Feb 2012 #13

It's not about Taxpayer's paying for Contraception or Viagra BOHICA12 Feb 2012 #7

Your point is well made customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #9

Not any more jeff47 Feb 2012 #14

You nailed it. CrispyQ Feb 2012 #32

Thank You!!! Do church related hospitals get tax deductions? n/t shcrane71 Feb 2012 #34

Only the ones available to any non-profit hospital (nt) jeff47 Feb 2012 #35

Churches aren't paying for contraception... health insurance companies are. shcrane71 Feb 2012 #17

And if you're a self-insured entity ... who pays? BOHICA12 Feb 2012 #20

What? MattBaggins Feb 2012 #36

Contraceptives save health insurers and healthcare consumers money... shcrane71 Feb 2012 #47

Because dirty old men need to get their dicks up. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #10

Just not the same, FogerRox Feb 2012 #11

I see the equity argument here: ED only happens to men, pregnancy only happens to women. CTyankee Feb 2012 #12

Yes you are right Dokkie Feb 2012 #15

Oh, I see "eliminate a potential child." And what if that woman chooses not to have another CTyankee Feb 2012 #18

Lol Dokkie Feb 2012 #19

thank you for clarifying. I'm sorry that you needed to. CTyankee Feb 2012 #29

Churches shouldn't be in the business of providing health insurance shcrane71 Feb 2012 #41

Right, and, there is more too it. FogerRox Feb 2012 #51

It's very difficult to get men to empathize with women's health issues that have been shcrane71 Feb 2012 #53

Churches objections to contraception is that sex should only be for procreation shcrane71 Feb 2012 #16

You missing the point here Dokkie Feb 2012 #21

Incorrect... Obama's compromise states that health insurance coverage must include contraceptives shcrane71 Feb 2012 #25

Really? joeglow3 Feb 2012 #27

Seems a portion of the population REALLY has a problem doing simple cost analysis... Sooo for you! shcrane71 Feb 2012 #33

It isn't a contraceptive. mmonk Feb 2012 #22

Which 98% percent of Catholic women use. I'm sure the numbers are similar for other religious sects shcrane71 Feb 2012 #26

Agree. However, the Catholic church is not a democracy joeglow3 Feb 2012 #28

The Catholic Church doesn't have to operate businesses MattBaggins Feb 2012 #37

It extends beyond just the church joeglow3 Feb 2012 #38

Yes they should be forced to violate those beliefs MattBaggins Feb 2012 #39

Because those violate other Constitutional rights joeglow3 Feb 2012 #40

It's a MEDICATION! A cost-effective, proven medication. If a so-called health care shcrane71 Feb 2012 #44

The problem with the Constitution is that you need to support those things you may oppose joeglow3 Feb 2012 #45

It's unconstitutional to require Health Care providers to provide contraceptives? That's ludicrous. shcrane71 Feb 2012 #46

When it violates someone else's rights under the Constitution, yes. joeglow3 Feb 2012 #48

Clerk of courts in many states must deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples because it's the law. shcrane71 Feb 2012 #52

Many people are making six figures a year working for "non-profits" helping the needy. shcrane71 Feb 2012 #42

True but I was just giving the reason or answer. mmonk Feb 2012 #30

Thanks... that's what I thought you were doing. Still, they want to start a war then be prepared shcrane71 Feb 2012 #31

Zey Vant more Peepz! fascisthunter Feb 2012 #23

How many child molesting priests need the pill? Come on, get real rustydog Feb 2012 #24

It's as if we have a lop-sided, male bias in our legislature, religious leaders..... spanone Feb 2012 #43

Because it might result in more of the right kind of babies. JNelson6563 Feb 2012 #49

I'm 100% fine with covering anything TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #50

This is often the first, middle, and last argument I hear amongst women from all different shcrane71 Feb 2012 #54

Why are taxpayers paying for Viagra? wallsan Jul 2012 #55

Welcome to DU. The Veterans Administration (VA hospitals) are 100% supported from shcrane71 Jul 2012 #56