Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ceonupe

(597 posts)
33. You are right in some cases
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 01:39 PM
Jul 2013

Look at it this way

If a school has been bad for 10-20 years like most poor performing urban schools the damage is already done. Their obviously is little accountability in that system even if it is public because if there was improvement would have been made or new options tried. As it stands now those children are actively being failed by the current system.

I worked with one as a volunteer mentor (I had 2 young men that I worked with over a 2 year stretch as a key component like you said is having an active involved adovcate for the child these boys mothers were active but their work schedule prevented them from attending many functions and meetings that's another place the mentors stepped in to help) that was privately funded (an older persons estate who passed funded it)for the first 5 years it was open and focused on the most add risk and need students. Their results were amazing and now that the state has expanded charter schools they are funded by a combination of both private funding and public money.

This school is so effective many times judges work with teen offenders and get them enrolled there as their success rate is far higher than the publics alternative behavior school.

My point is while people debate charter vs public vs more funding vs ........ Urban kids are failing at an incredibly high rate many areas with less than 50% minority graduation from high school and the numbers for black males specifically are much worse.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bartley must be planning to run for office, and need the bigoted gun lover vote. Hoyt Jul 2013 #1
I don't see how convincing he will be if he can't show that he understood the basic Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #2
Screw him. Little Star Jul 2013 #3
Sir Charles has always made an effort at addressing current events intelligently. TroglodyteScholar Jul 2013 #4
Well stated. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #8
Hmmm DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2013 #5
Isn't he a basketball player? notadmblnd Jul 2013 #6
LOL. Seriously, though, Barkley has a right to his opinion, just like anyone else. However, HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #7
I posted it because it was given attention. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #9
Glad you posted it. It got play because Barkley has toyed with running for office and byeya Jul 2013 #13
No worries and not an attack on you whatsoever. I'm not an acolyte of the HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #16
Maybe you should drop into the Lounge. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #17
He is a black man giving out some of the white conservative line, so the media treestar Jul 2013 #15
Not to mention that the Orlando Sentinel Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #18
He is, but people have tried to back him running for office in Alabama. He was a republican at one Hoyt Jul 2013 #12
That's always good to know. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #19
You disidoro01 Jul 2013 #10
this fact is proven all over DU ceonupe Jul 2013 #14
The most difficult thing to do in the Democratic party, is to reach agreement Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #21
It's simple ceonupe Jul 2013 #25
I don't think this is a good place to defend Charter Schools. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #29
You are right in some cases ceonupe Jul 2013 #33
Privatization vs. social justice Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #40
Sounds like you agree with the republicans Kingofalldems Jul 2013 #34
Ding ding ding ceonupe Jul 2013 #36
An issue you say? I've lost count of how many issues Kingofalldems Jul 2013 #38
I don't agree with cheap labor at Walmart ceonupe Jul 2013 #39
I'm sure Barkley's opinions get far more attention than anything we have to say. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #20
what did he say that was inaccurate? ceonupe Jul 2013 #11
If racial profiling had been allowed, this would have been elevated to a hate crime. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #23
The problem is racial profiling is not against the law ceonupe Jul 2013 #24
That is incorrect. Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #26
Those rules are civil not criminal ceonupe Jul 2013 #27
No, he didn't speak the truth. He spoke his opinion based on what LEO and media put out notadmblnd Jul 2013 #31
Racial profiling is legally irrelevant to the verdict. cthulu2016 Jul 2013 #22
Zimmerman had superficial injuries. So the use of deadly force was NOT warranted. Skwmom Jul 2013 #28
Barkley has the brains of a turnip. Zoeisright Jul 2013 #30
When did Trayvon Martin have the right to self defense? bluestate10 Jul 2013 #32
Could that switch be someone pulling a gun out and threating to use it? Rex Jul 2013 #35
And which witnesses testified to this? XemaSab Jul 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charles Barkley is confus...»Reply #33