Obama Administration Asks Supreme Court to Dismiss ACLU Challenge to Warrantless Wiretapping Law!

[bvar22]

50. Don't you ever get dizzy from all the spinning?

I posted other examples above,
but ALL I need is one example to completely discredit your premise.

The DoJ has the freedom to chose ,
and White House Policy CAN be determined by what they choose to fight.
In THIS case, the White House is fighting FOR the Power to Spy on Americans without a Warrant,
and retroactive immunity for the Telecoms.

You said:

[font color=red]"These attempts to vilify Obama are contradicted by the reality at every turn.

So will you admit that in directing the DoJ to stop defending DADT Obama did the right thing?
Will you admit that you have no idea whether Obama directed the DoJ to defend Warrantless Wiretapping?

No, of course you can't. Your desire to believe he's the bad guy won't let you."

[/font]
The above is an Ad Hominem Logical Fallacy commonly used when someone loses an argument.
Your statement also contains two completely fabricated Falsehoods.
FAIL.
I have never mentioned President Obama,
and have discussed the facts and policy ONLY.
It YOU have decided that a truthful presentation of the FACTS are an attack on the President,
that is YOUR problem.



Let us apply the Bullshit Detector.

If the Bush White House was fighting for the Power to Spy On Americans without a Warrant,
and retroactive Immunity for the Telecoms,
would you be saying:
"Just doing their job folks.
Nothing to see here.
Purely routine."



You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]