Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Rolling Stone Cover? This is why it is wrong....warning Graphic Photo. [View all]
I know HerRePost
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022731219
Martin Richard lay dead behind my friend. His parents are reaching out to him in anquish.

This is the reason that Rolling Stone should not be placing the Marathon Bomber on the cover. Tsarnaev's sweet picture, front and center for all of us to see.
Many say we need to see how such a sweet boy could do such a thing. Seriously? Those of us in Boston have heard that story. We were here and we watched all the news. We know Tsarnaev's history. We do not need more.
Honor Bostons loss.
This is Boston!
We've also seen astonishing courage. In the years to come, as we celebrate future marathons, we'll of course never forget what happened in Boston. But our memories won't just be fixated on the horror of wounded bodies. Just like flight 93, there will be an enduring and inspiring record of those who rose to the moment. In the police officers, soldiers, and bystanders who ripped down barricades and went door to door and gave their lives, in the EMTs and doctors who worked relentlessly to preserve life. And in the runners, who, after 26 miles of brutal physical endeavor, turned and ran into the smoke to rescue strangers.
And even though it might not last, for a time at least, our political rancor faded. Boston proved that the foundations of American government remain firm. We took comfort in the FBI press conferences. We kept trust in our great offices of state. When it came to Boston, there were no Republicans and Democrats, just American leaders.
But perhaps this is the most powerful truth of Boston: At the crucial core of our identity, the divisions between us are paper thin. Red Sox fans like me will never forget the support of our coastal neighbor (and hated rival), the New York Yankees. But for all our teams' bitter history, in those two minutes in which Yankees fans sang Boston's "Sweet Caroline," Red Sox Nation and our entire nation saw a clear and certain truth. Whatever our creed, whatever our regional allegiance, whatever our color, whatever our politics, we are one people. We are a people individually diverse but unbreakably united.
http://theweek.com/article/index/243029/from-boston-powerful-truths-for-america
h/t Cha for the link
From my original post.
I have worked with her.
I did not know she was there that day, until a friend sent me this picture. I have several friends that work on Boylston Street. They were only a couple doors down from the blast. They lost windows on two floors.
I have seen two of them this week. With tears in their eyes, they tell of the shock they felt upon seeing fallen bodies, the blood, the severed limbs. It is something that they will carry with them forever. They are getting grief counselling, I hope it helps with the nightmares.
I work with another woman, her eyes filled with emotion, when she told me her daughter and son in law were attending Krystals wake today. I work with three people that live in Watertown, it was a war zone.
Tragedy occurs and we all weep for the loss, feel their pain. We do feel it. Yet it is chilling when it touches you personally, it sends shivers down your spine. These are people that I have laughed with, joked with, had lunch with. I have never been so close to a tragedy like this. I have never had a personal connection to the people involved in such an event. Until Monday.
In time, the pain will lessen. In time we will heal.
We are Boston Strong and yes we will survive.
194 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rolling Stone Cover? This is why it is wrong....warning Graphic Photo. [View all]
sheshe2
Jul 2013
OP
Tired argument...do you acknowledge that if you were missing a leg right now courtesy of Jahar
BeyondGeography
Jul 2013
#76
I think the people getting their knickers in a twist over this are ridiculous.
Spider Jerusalem
Jul 2013
#2
Of course it is. The whole point was "How did someone with this much potential go so wrong?"
NYC Liberal
Jul 2013
#7
If you can't figure out the difference between one day of "display" laid flat, and a month
MADem
Jul 2013
#23
My personal view, as someone from the Bay State, is that the magazine cover is tasteless.
MADem
Jul 2013
#28
Are you sure about that? I keep asking for a copy of that cover, and no one can come up with it.
MADem
Jul 2013
#134
Who's whining? I'm just pointing out what is obvious to anyone reading this thread.
MADem
Jul 2013
#188
No. I do not agree. Otherwise they would have used one of his "normal kid" shots, not a "glamour
MADem
Jul 2013
#131
Rolling Stone is published every two weeks, issues are not on the stand for a month but for two
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#94
I don't 'claim to be a big expert'--I have read the thing off and on since the late sixties.
MADem
Jul 2013
#123
They love this attention. Just like the people trying to ban movies. It always....
Logical
Jul 2013
#56
No one is trying to "ban" anything. Some businesses are saying "We won't sell your shit. Buy it
MADem
Jul 2013
#133
You can think whatever you'd like, and others can have the very same impression of you.
MADem
Jul 2013
#137
Indeed, as are you--and you can even do so quite proudly and smugly, if you'd like. nt
MADem
Jul 2013
#140
Look, you don't have to share your innermost thoughts with me. I understand that you're a bit upset
MADem
Jul 2013
#161
The article is online--most people have read it, and while it doesn't plow much new ground, the
MADem
Jul 2013
#187
You are most welcome. I think they don't quite realize it yet, but they're hoisting themselves upon
MADem
Jul 2013
#144
Not even the most basic facts are correct, hard to read past the glaring errors. Rolling Stone is
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#93
How did they react when that same picture was on the front page of pretty much every newspaper?
Spider Jerusalem
Jul 2013
#72
"I think the people getting their knickers in a twist over this are ridiculous."
sheshe2
Jul 2013
#91
obama was on their cover. did you protest then? his policies have killed FAR more people nt
msongs
Jul 2013
#3
The regulations and 'ZONING' of the Texas plant is the fault of Governor Perry and Texas - not Obama
Tx4obama
Jul 2013
#166
So the best way to prevent it from happening in the future is to stick head in sand
dogknob
Jul 2013
#8
Damn, now I'm going to have to subscribe to the first magazine I'll have paid for in years
Fumesucker
Jul 2013
#14
Oh, your glee in boasting that leftist hippie rag is going under is all the impetus I need
Fumesucker
Jul 2013
#17
It just doesn't look like a good business decision to me. That's all I wanted to get across.
ReRe
Jul 2013
#21
Banned in Boston. Why folks from other places are not always in that chorus....
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#102
It was a huge publicity blitz for them, make no mistake--no one buys magazines in July anyway.
MADem
Jul 2013
#25
He also publishes US WEEKLY, that will put whatever it needs to on the cover to drive sales.
MADem
Jul 2013
#49
I'm afraid there's only one POV that is "acceptable" to some....and that is that people who object
MADem
Jul 2013
#189
Thank, I will make a point to go to my local purveyor and getting a copy
nadinbrzezinski
Jul 2013
#112
Those are weekly news magazines, not a music-entertainment magazine that does the odd
MADem
Jul 2013
#51
That is not the case. First Amendment applies to government, but other entities
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#122
Boston happily gave up its right in regards to warrantless searches during this ordeal...
egduj
Jul 2013
#55
I always feel that "honoring a loss" without looking at any other part of a tragedy fosters an odd
Brickbat
Jul 2013
#63
Were you equally "bothered" by all the people who had convicted Zimmerman
Common Sense Party
Jul 2013
#88
Then I applaud your even-handedness. But on DU, saying "let's wait for the evidence,
Common Sense Party
Jul 2013
#103
I wonder at the reaction here if George Zimmerman were put on the cover of Guns and Ammo.
cigsandcoffee
Jul 2013
#92
I disagree. On the cover of Rolling Stone, pretty much anyone looks like a pop star.
cigsandcoffee
Jul 2013
#105
Visuals have a stronger impact than words, and Rolling Stone knows this.
cigsandcoffee
Jul 2013
#110
except that RS isn't trying to pass the patriot act, nor is it trying to bash the victims of boston.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#184