Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

brush

(61,033 posts)

33. Any jury that wasn't predisposed

Reply to XemaSab (Original post)

Mon Jul 22, 2013, 01:18 PM

Jul 2013

to do their racist duty in a racist county should have seen through zimmerman's huge lies, especially the alleged 20-30 head bashes on concrete that he just walked away from).

I keep posting these links but you never acknowledge that you went to them:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023254619

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3306770

The jury saw their duty and they did it, especially B37, she had a book deal to cash in on so she wanted out of that jury room quick.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

One last thread before I bow out of World War Z [View all] XemaSab Jul 2013 OP

Oh? RobertEarl Jul 2013 #1

you know what? Fuck Zimmerman quinnox Jul 2013 #2

Well said! hrmjustin Jul 2013 #3

thanks quinnox Jul 2013 #5

I HEAR YOU Skittles Jul 2013 #11

OP isn't defending zimmerman. Tunkamerica Jul 2013 #16

Unfortunately there's a lot of simplistic thinking on these sorts of issues mythology Jul 2013 #46

KnR, and good luck trying to be reasonable and analytical around here just now. Hekate Jul 2013 #4

Noted... onpatrol98 Jul 2013 #6

Good post... +1 Pelican Jul 2013 #7

The case was much better than it was presented. DevonRex Jul 2013 #8

I think Corey hamstrung them on race. Much like the OJ trial, msanthrope Jul 2013 #30

That's my take on it, too. And the poor dumb RW Floridians DevonRex Jul 2013 #39

Yeah, I'm not a lawyer and I could have assembled a better proscution case. It was Nay Jul 2013 #34

Oh noes u r disappointed in DU...whaaaaaaaaaaaa Rex Jul 2013 #9

Zimmerman will get his mwrguy Jul 2013 #10

My magic 8-ball is saying... hunter Jul 2013 #12

The one thing I will always remember about you BainsBane Jul 2013 #13

Thank you, very much so. uppityperson Jul 2013 #14

The same "moral authority" that allows you pintobean Jul 2013 #17

You can count 85% of this site in on that BainsBane Jul 2013 #18

Lol. 85% pintobean Jul 2013 #19

Okay, so you think the majority of DUers BainsBane Jul 2013 #21

I didn't ask about anything pintobean Jul 2013 #22

Okay, I stand corrected BainsBane Jul 2013 #23

+1 PotatoChip Jul 2013 #27

Well said, I completely agree... Spazito Jul 2013 #28

and English was her third language Ghost of Tom Joad Jul 2013 #35

Not really. Her family spoke a diferent language before. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #37

+1 uponit7771 Jul 2013 #38

I said he was obvious trolling and a jury agreed with me. Rex Jul 2013 #40

Was a post hidden? BainsBane Jul 2013 #41

#9 in this thread. Rex Jul 2013 #42

If my best friend was murdered, this is not how I would be acting during the trial: XemaSab Jul 2013 #43

You aren't her BainsBane Jul 2013 #44

Did I say anything about her that wasn't true? XemaSab Jul 2013 #45

Zimmerman shot an unarmed 17 year old... Drunken Irishman Jul 2013 #15

How about the racist laws that helped Zman walk, bigots like B37, guns, etc. Hoyt Jul 2013 #20

I believe that your outrage is based on a major misconception on the burden of proof grantcart Jul 2013 #24

You are incorrect on burden of proof Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #25

It is still an affirmative defense. grantcart Jul 2013 #29

Once again, you are wrong Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #32

Your posts on this topic have disappointed me. Marrah_G Jul 2013 #26

That's a thoughtful, articulate and just great post Boom Sound 416 Jul 2013 #31

Any jury that wasn't predisposed brush Jul 2013 #33

Guess what? Those "legal concepts"? They apply to jurors, as has been posted only about a zillion WinkyDink Jul 2013 #36