Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
38. Most DUers don't, and I never assume they do.
Mon Jul 22, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jul 2013

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

With over 7 Billion people on this planet, MineralMan Jul 2013 #1
Your theory could be right. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #2
Well, the thing is that there has been a lot of research MineralMan Jul 2013 #7
Pointless to speculate. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #15
Yes. Pointless. As you say, we are not cancer MineralMan Jul 2013 #21
I don't see why it wouldn't be transmissible Politicalboi Jul 2013 #3
Doctors ask to determine genetic risk factors NoOneMan Jul 2013 #5
Yes, there are. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #13
Thats genetical predisposition. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #9
Basic immunology says they couldn't invade NickB79 Jul 2013 #12
Relax. That's medically impossible. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #19
Papilloma virus is very common. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #22
I am aware of that. There are many viruses in the animal kingdom that can cause cancer. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #31
I have a medical background actually. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #33
Most DUers don't, and I never assume they do. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #38
Family cancers are transmitted genetically, though NickB79 Jul 2013 #11
It could be they were both experiencing the same environmental triggers/causes NoOneMan Jul 2013 #4
Nice sharpshootin', Tex. AngryAmish Jul 2013 #18
Genetically (and environmentally) transmissible, elleng Jul 2013 #6
Were they identical types of cancer? MineralMan Jul 2013 #8
Not in this case, no. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #10
Then it's highly unlikely that there was any sort of transmission. MineralMan Jul 2013 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Jul 2013 #20
I am done here with this topic. MineralMan Jul 2013 #23
because he has a functioning brain Kali Jul 2013 #24
Oh, hi Kali! how are you feeling today? darkangel218 Jul 2013 #27
I was wondering where you were.. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #29
IIRC, most cancer is attributable to lifestyle/exposure to toxins/diet. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #16
Cancer isn't a single disease; it's a type of disease The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2013 #17
I blame aliens Silent3 Jul 2013 #25
THATS IT!!, darkangel218 Jul 2013 #26
Environmental mzmolly Jul 2013 #28
Could be. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #30
um, don't you have to take some basic biology for nursing school? Kali Jul 2013 #32
I told you before, your personal attacks only reflect on what kind of person you are. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #34
From NPR darkangel218 Jul 2013 #35
Well, I will certainly be cautious around any Tasmanian Devils MineralMan Jul 2013 #36
You said you were done with this thread darkangel218 Jul 2013 #37
I see. Please proceed. MineralMan Jul 2013 #39
Nope, you do. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #40
OK. But think what you'll miss. MineralMan Jul 2013 #41
If there are free radicals in the blood - theoretically you could transmit a cancer causing agent srican69 Jul 2013 #42
Back in the 80s, the reserchers could have sworn darkangel218 Jul 2013 #43
You can't catch cancer, no. LeftishBrit Jul 2013 #44
"You cant catch cancer" is what we know at this time. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #38