Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
5. Interesting, but the wrong way to go about it
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:40 PM
Jul 2013

It is not reasonable to expect rich people to give up ALL their money. The way I would phrase it as a talking point would be to look at the how much more money would be available if the 1% didn't have all these loopholes that allow them to pay less tax (percentage-wise) than the rest of us.

For example, a hedge fund manager whose $1 billion income is taxed (if taxed at all thanks to tax dodges) at around 15% (the capital gains rate) instead of being taxed as ordinary earnings. What could we do with the extra $150 million a year in tax revenue (leaving the poor dear to struggle by on a meager $650-$700 million a year)?

By my calculations, $150 million would pay for an additional 2,500 teachers. And this is just ONE billionaire, we have 425 by last count.

Also, removing the cap on income subject to social security currently around $100,000, would fully fund the the program until Captain Kirk was ready to retire.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»11 Shocking Things The Ri...»Reply #5