Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Greenwald is not the left. [View all]MineralMan
(151,454 posts)15. Yes. A good jury decision, all around. Results below:
At Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:59 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
Doesn't seem to be at times
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3321800
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
YOUR COMMENTS:
Posting this photoshopped melding of President Obama and George W. Bush is the same as saying Obama=Bush, and that is hurtful, rude, over the top and disruptive content. This post should be hidden, at the very minimum. The TOS violation is something else, again. We don't do this on DU, or shouldn't.
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:04 PM, and voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Can't I peruse DU for one fucking day WITHOUT Obama hate???
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: Disgusting.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Alert is for TOS violations, not because someone said something bad about Obama. Learn to discern the difference.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: ARRGGHHH!! MY EYES!!!!
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Personally, I think the photoshop illustrates something very real about Obama's policies, especially when the involve the military-industrial complex, corporate rights, and civil liberties. I think the alert description is over the top.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Thank you.
Doesn't seem to be at times
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3321800
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
YOUR COMMENTS:
Posting this photoshopped melding of President Obama and George W. Bush is the same as saying Obama=Bush, and that is hurtful, rude, over the top and disruptive content. This post should be hidden, at the very minimum. The TOS violation is something else, again. We don't do this on DU, or shouldn't.
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:04 PM, and voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Can't I peruse DU for one fucking day WITHOUT Obama hate???
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: Disgusting.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Alert is for TOS violations, not because someone said something bad about Obama. Learn to discern the difference.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: ARRGGHHH!! MY EYES!!!!
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Personally, I think the photoshop illustrates something very real about Obama's policies, especially when the involve the military-industrial complex, corporate rights, and civil liberties. I think the alert description is over the top.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Thank you.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Neither is Prosense. Far right ideology disquised as "it's the best we can do". To them, Torture is
grahamhgreen
Jul 2013
#85
It's always great to see newcomers drop by and accuse old members of being trolls!
struggle4progress
Jul 2013
#84
So when you rec'd Flamingodem's 'convergence' thread you weren't supporting it.
last1standing
Jul 2013
#54
I've provided responses to your ad hominem attacks on Greenwald multiple times in the past.
Maedhros
Jul 2013
#58
Please don't be flattered by this rare response. It will probably be the last for a long time.
A Simple Game
Jul 2013
#94
Your "Third Way Worldspeak" linguistic framing might fool a few seriously reality challenged idiots,
Zorra
Jul 2013
#27
Cory Booker's defense of Wall Street may hurt his status with liberals, but it won't hurt his bank
Zorra
Jul 2013
#41
The point here is: Greenwald is a left progressive, who is supporting a left progressive
Zorra
Jul 2013
#66
First we are told over and over and over again to do the work of supporting better democrats then,
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#77
Haven't commented on this before b/c I don't quite know what to make of it...
War Horse
Jul 2013
#71
Lol. Let us know when you are invited to speak at a Socialism conference.
kenny blankenship
Jul 2013
#75
He is the center. Just because he DLC and pukes have moved to the right does not mean reality has
on point
Jul 2013
#102
No he isn't. He's a big-L Libertarian. But no amount of evidence will concince the faithful.
ucrdem
Jul 2013
#107
I thought it wasn't about Greenwald. But here you are, making it into a personality.
Quantess
Jul 2013
#120
Like David Sirota and many progressives he was opposing the Obama drone program and on that
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2013
#140