Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(4,482 posts)

16. I was referring to the compulsion to expose.

Wed Jul 24, 2013, 10:29 AM

Jul 2013

I guess it would be ok, but ONLY if there is mutual consent and only if you are not a politician who the opposition is looking to destroy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mr. Weiner and the Elusive Truth [View all] Little Star Jul 2013 OP

Mode of exposure PADemD Jul 2013 #7

are you kidding? BillStein Jul 2013 #11

I was referring to the compulsion to expose. PADemD Jul 2013 #16

There is no difference. You are right. Little Star Jul 2013 #14

agreed bcbink Jul 2013 #18

You sex cops need to decide... 99Forever Jul 2013 #3

There was no sex as far as anyone knows, so... boston bean Jul 2013 #4

You'd be amazed BainsBane Jul 2013 #20

Pervert obsession is alive and well. You can't have it both ways. Little Star Jul 2013 #5

Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #8

Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #10

ppfffftttt Little Star Jul 2013 #13

Interesting pintobean Jul 2013 #15

how about the guy has no fucking impulse control at all? cali Jul 2013 #6

exactly BillStein Jul 2013 #12

lol! How true! Little Star Jul 2013 #21

Weiner's new campaign slogan should be VOTE FOR QUAGMIRE! alp227 Jul 2013 #22