Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Proud Member Of "The Glenn Greenwald Left" Here. [View all]grantcart
(53,061 posts)275. So you don't think that an OP that is titled: Proud Member Of "The Glenn Greenwald Left" Here
is an OP that doesn't imply that he has a heroic standing?
It is the OP that tied the metric for credibility in a person as
Right Versus Wrong is my barometer for who has credibility and who doesn't.
Greenwald didn't get it wrong on the question of the Walla Walla City Council but on the most important question before Congress to date in the 21st Century
So using the OPs metric I would find GG didn't do very well. Beyond that GG continued to see no difference between the two parties in the last two elections and is a major Paul apologist, although he likes to wave away Paul's "unfortunate past baggage" with the same light stroke that he excuses his own.
Those that have strong feelings for Greenwald or Assange (either for or against) are the ones that are practicing "dichotomized thinking". If you are such a strong supporter of Greenwald then that would apply to you, not me. You have misinterpreted my entire argument in assuming that I am a Greenwald hater, which would be a black and white viewpoint. For me I take the most clearly articulated NON dichotomized position on Greenwald on DU: that he is neither a hero nor a villain.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023322707
As to the question of civil liberties.
You may get yourself exercised about the use of phone records as an investigative tool. Fine. I am willing to discuss that but before we elevate its importance to the end all of the civil rights record do me one favor: show me one victim who had the federal government knock on his door because of the use of these records. The concern about its potential misuse is fine but in the real world this administration has brought forward a substantial increase in civil rights of real people in the US.
You may not be that connected to immigrant communities in the US but I live and work in them. All of my family are born outside of the US and all of their significant others come from outside of the US. One of my future son in laws is an undocumented worker.
From 2000 to 2008 the Bush administration at various times used ICE to go to Hispanic neighborhoods and pick up thousands of law abiding undocumented workers:
http://revcom.us/a/104/ice-raids-en.html
1200 Immigrants Arrested in Massive ICE Sweep in Los Angeles
At 5:15 a.m. on August 30, Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents converged at a supermarket parking lot in Maywood, California. Armed and wearing bulletproof vests, they looked through a list of the names and addresses of targeted people before descending upon homes and apartment complexes in the neighborhoods where so-called criminal aliens live. This was one of many raids that have taken place throughout Southern California in the past two weeks.
In total 1,200 people have been detained in these massive raids, and at least 600 of those arrested have already been deported. ICE boasts that this is the largest operation they have conducted in the U.S. so far. Most of the arrests took place in Los Angeleswith many people also being picked up in Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura County.
As word spread, shopping centers and neighborhoods that are usually full of life and activity became still. Teachers at ESL schools reported dramatically low attendance. A 19-year-old student from Guatemala told Revolution, I spent six months in jail in San Antonio because I didnt have papers when I was 16 years old. They deported me, but I risked it again and came back. Imagine what it feels like to know that you could be grabbed at any momentI just want to send money to my family. Im no criminal!
People in the targeted neighborhoods said that many of the arrests have been made at dawn while people are getting ready to go to work or families are still asleep. Now, people dont open the door to anyone or talk about the whereabouts of their neighbors to anyone they dont know.
Immediately after getting control of the government Obama stopped these real civil rights abuses that constituted real "knocks on the door".
He directed ICE to stop deportations of long term undocumented residents that have no criminal ties.
He extended temporary protection status to hundreds of thousands of people. In fact you can't find statistics on it because the President has done it with many different classes. My future son in law, an undocumented worker, carries around a government ID that keeps his civil liberties safe.
Here is an example of just one of his executive orders and how it affects real people and real civil rights:

(CNN) -- Long lines formed at help centers and lawyers' office across America Wednesday as thousands of young, undocumented immigrants began applying for relief from deportation.
They took advantage of one of the biggest immigration policy changes in years. An executive order by President Barack Obama allows those who entered the country illegally as children to remain and work without fear of deportation for at least two years.
A crowd formed at Chicago's Navy Pier Wednesday to get help from immigration lawyers and fill out forms.
. . .
The forms were made available two months after Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said that people who arrived in the United States as children may request consideration of deferred action for a period of two years subject to renewal, and upon approval would be eligible for work authorization.
As many as 1.7 million youths may qualify for the program, according to the Pew Hispanic Center, a project of the Pew Research Center.
Dubbed Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, the deferral program was created in June under an executive order signed by President Barack Obama
So in my people's eyes you and Greenwald are the hypocrite because you place so much emphasis on a theoretical issue (use of meta data) with no identifiable victims and fail to see the real civil rights protection that the President has extended to 11 million law abiding undocumented workers. Greenwald doesn't take any of these real civil rights protections when he lambasts the Administration and here is the real irony: Apparently Greenwald lives in Brazil because he is denied the right to bring his same sex partner into the US. This is a real civil rights violation. This administration has done more to fight that issue and extend civil rights to same sex couples than any other.
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-obama-gay-marriage-benefits-20130627,0,4035740.story
Responding to a question about the same-sex-marriage decisions, Obama said that in the weeks leading up to the courts decision, he had asked the White House counsels office to work with Justice Department lawyers to comb through every federal statute to look at the potential effect of striking down the federal law, known as DOMA. The act barred legally married same-sex couples from receiving federal benefits that are otherwise available to married people, such as joint-filing status for income taxes or survivor benefits under Social Security.
They are now moving to extend civil rights to same sex couples in the military
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/15846-pentagon-prepares-to-extend-benefits-to-military-same-sex-couples
The Department of Defense welcomes the Supreme Courts decision today on the Defense of Marriage Act, a statement from Hagel's office read. The Department will immediately begin the process of implementing the Supreme Courts decision in consultation with the Department of Justice and other executive branch agencies. The Department of Defense intends to make the same benefits available to all military spouses regardless of sexual orientation as soon as possible. That is now the law, and it is the right thing to do.
I look forward to the day in the near future when same sex couples like Greenwald will be able get visa benefits for their spouses.
Those that have made the NSA meta data issue the be all and end all of the civil rights issue, as you apparently do, are the real hypocrites on civil rights abuses. This President has done more, much much more, on extending legal protection to millions of people living in the US and those that present any matrix that puts the President at the bottom of civil rights advancement is simply ignoring the millions of people going to bed tonight with a concrete executive order that now gives them more rights than they had in 2008. I know that to be true because my family is one of those families.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
322 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Lol, it's amazing how much some people know about this guy. I think the last time I
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#13
I know. I'm trying to figure out what all this is supposed to accomplish. Eg, am I supposed
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#28
Well, it's clearly not working. I hope no one is paying for this as it would be a huge waste of
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#44
They have the effect of making life-long democrats want to run screaming from the party
whatchamacallit
Jul 2013
#49
Since you mention it, I've wondered for a while now if that really is the goal, because you are
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#51
"There's going to be a big battle in the 2016 primaries." I wish. Problem is that
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#144
Because the Left is always right. And in an atmosphere of lies and deceptions, the left always
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#8
And that needs to change. The Left should never try to defend itself agaiinst the inane attacks
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#216
I agree, but it wasn't MY idea, I'm just running with the latest attack on the 'left'. Call it using
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#6
Sure, but to most intelligent minds that isn't even an issue. I learned to fight fire with fire
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#10
Greenwald is trying to get at the truth? By posting inaccurate information regarding data-mining
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#17
He's a traitor for releasing old information that we all already knew, and which also isn't true.
Marr
Jul 2013
#241
You want a list of Democrats FOR Civil Liberties? I can provide that too for you.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#19
Okay, my mistake. And the Greenwald Left is not my label. That came from the latest attack
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#159
I think from this comment, that you misunderstood the OP. I was pointing out who is ANTI- Left
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#242
In "Centrist," I hear, "No Changes in our Personal Power vs the Transnational Corporations"
HumansAndResources
Jul 2013
#239
Ah, so you practice guilt by association. That's TOTALLY a mark of Progressive Democrats.
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#15
Excuse me? I'm pretty far left but I'm not an ideologue and I"m not prone to ratfucking.
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#25
your support of right-wing policy would indicate that you are pretty far from far left
frylock
Jul 2013
#116
no, I am fairly close to being a socialist. But I understand politics means cutting deals.
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#161
i am a socialist, and cutting deals and capitulation have two entirely different defintions..
frylock
Jul 2013
#164
Where have I EVER defended "untettered surveillance"? That is the whole point. I do not.
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#170
Yes, it reminds of Rush frankly, whose constant attacks on 'lieberals' include that phrase
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#249
We understand that too, that politics is about cutting deals. And usually you want YOUR side
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#184
So you want to end poverty but just not in a hurry? And those in a hurry are ideologues?
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#208
So what do you think then, of OPs that trash the 'left' by compairing them to say, Alex Jones?
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#23
That OP compared the reactions/methods of conspiracy theorists on both sides of political spectrum.
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#26
THAT OP was exactly what you described, an attempt at 'guilt by association'. This one was to point
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#31
And it's telling that when Libertarian trolls post here, their screeds get recommended by some.
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#18
this is worth listening to if only for the first 5 min. to hear Jeremy Scahill's introduction of
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2013
#27
I wouldn't say I stand with Greenwald but I stand with anyone who tries to ferret out corruption
byeya
Jul 2013
#29
Proud member of the anti-Iraq war, anti-Citizens United, anti Ron and Rand Paul left
ProSense
Jul 2013
#32
Btw, it was not I who called Glenn Greenwald 'left'. Did you go into that thread
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#104
I don't think they are nincampoops or gullible. Some imo, are just weak and don't want to lose
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#43
Good post, but I'm inclined to disagree regarding the age demographics of the 'gullible' over
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#77
Yes, I think maybe you got that right. The young certainly do seem to get it, maybe because
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#244
I could not agree more with your last sentence, having spent my early online years mostly on
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#228
I had responded to your original comment but it was deleted when I posted. So here it is again:
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#41
The intensity of emotion re Greenwald is coming from elsewhere. It isn't coming from the Left.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#178
Wow, thank you. That sounds more like a Liberal to me than many claiming the liberal label.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#251
It's from a page Glenn set up to counter the many misleading labels that he gets tagged with.
Maedhros
Jul 2013
#253
You are correct in that my understanding of Greenwald's position is not well informed.
grantcart
Jul 2013
#268
"All material published by Assange and Greenwald would have been published elsewhere by others"
delrem
Jul 2013
#223
In contrast to some persons with the big (D), he never voted for the Iraq War Resolution.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#81
Exactly. Those who would condemn him but not the Senators are hypocrites.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#137
No they would only be hypocrites if the lifted them up as heroes as the OP does.
grantcart
Jul 2013
#141
You want to know what I think? Really? I value truth. The OP did not say or imply he is a "hero."
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#152
So you don't think that an OP that is titled: Proud Member Of "The Glenn Greenwald Left" Here
grantcart
Jul 2013
#275
Nope. And no matter how long you make your post, it doesn't make your assertion true.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#278
And no matter how short you make your post it doesn't make the your avoidance of
grantcart
Jul 2013
#279
Your issue was whether he was a "hero". Now you are changing the subject again.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#280
And yet you were a very serious supporter of Chuck 'Republicans Who Voted For War'
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#95
First, this OP was merely a response to an attack on the LEFT, using Greenwald as a tactic to do so.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#191
He hates US fed govt wealth distribution so much that he won't even pay taxes into it.
great white snark
Jul 2013
#98
Well, that wasn't MY phrase. I was merely responding to yet another assault on the 'left'.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#48
Greenwald opposes all cuts to SS, Medicare & Medicaid, supports public financing of elections
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#134
Thanks for your response. Re Republicans hating Government though, I'm not sure that is true.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#201
I love that word 'purist'. Lol! An old Third Way piece of propaganda against the Left that is pulled
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#94
1) They were not the same type of Republicans. 2) Lincoln did not appoint Confederates to his Admin.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#282
we must keep kicking and recommending this till it gets to the front page
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2013
#56
Well, I stand with protecting our Civil Liberties as I always have. And lately the attacks on the
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#62
Couldn't agree more. I'm merely using their own choice of target to respond to the attacks on the
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#63
the politicians and commentators I have always respected most are likewise supportive
carolinayellowdog
Jul 2013
#70
Yes, I was going to make a list, which thankfully is very long, of all the Democrats who
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#101
real journalist real journalist - not the caviar correspondents of Washington and New York
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2013
#75
Me too. The OP is merely a response to the latest attack on the Left right here on DU whereby
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#72
We've arrived at the fork in the road, the dissonance is deafening, this derivation of Democrats.
BornLooser
Jul 2013
#76
I agree with you. This was not my phrase, just responding to the latest attack on the Left wherein
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#82
I should have prefaced my opinion by stating that it was not directed at you, sabrina 1.
BornLooser
Jul 2013
#85
Thank you, I didn't take it personally, just wanted to explain the OP for those who didn't
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#89
He supported the ACLU's stand on Citizens United. Have you read their reasons for
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#86
Can you please post what GG said? I have read the ACLU's position on Citizen's United, but not
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#168
Never mind, thanks to Luminous Animal I see why you didn't want to enter into a discussion about
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#189
And?? Are you saying there is no right and no wrong? I asked you a question regarding
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#99
Dylan and I are on the same page on issues like this. So thanks for the reminder. But again,
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#105
No, that is YOUR claim. I am responding to what was pure flamebait today, yet another attack
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#232
The thread that prompted this one was a dumbass opinion piece from The Daily Banter
emulatorloo
Jul 2013
#238
Yes, flamebait should sink, but that is why it is called 'flamebait', because good people feel
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#240
When it comes to people's Civil Rights, there are no shades of grey. But that's just my opinion.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#92
Who are 'called Libertarians'? I am a Democrat, just fyi, and always have been. As
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#100
Really? That's quite a charge re Greenwald. Do you have something to back it up?
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#221
You know, you just called me a liar. I would like an apology as I do not engage in
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#97
You and a whole lot of other Americans. You have to wonder why anyone would not be when
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#106
But..but..he's not a loyal Democrat who rubberstamps Republican policies the boss likes them.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2013
#108
This conversation is founded in the psychological need to categorize oneself.
Billy Pilgrim
Jul 2013
#113
Greenwald: To apply "right-wing libertarian" label to someone with those views...is patently idiotic
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#142
Merely because YOU say that he supports the Paul's has never made it so.
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#145
The ACLU agrees with him on this from a legal standpoint. Do you oppose the ACLU also?
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#157
You haven't been reading the attacks on the Left here if you think 'binaries are a thing of the past
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#198
I can fry big fish and take care of the little ones at the same time. I am an amazing multi-tasker.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#248
Hi tblue, adore you too. The OP is actually kind of silly, but then I was responding to some
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#166
I think people are, it's been going on for quite a while on Democratic blogs and people are not
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#252
Greenwald can be right or wrong. The attacks, however, are largely dishonest.
DirkGently
Jul 2013
#139
THIS truly deserves its own OP. Excellent, excellent comment! I have nothing to add, and if you know
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#182
Excellent post, thank you for posting in my thread, it deserves its own thread.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#171
Thanks, I'm not sure if that was meant as a compliment or an insult, but you would never, ever
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#199
Lol, I know, I decided to use their own labels to respond. And now I am a fan girl of GG or
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#203
I'll take GG's own assessment of where he stands on the political spectrum if you don't mind.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#234
Of course it has. Every one of the feeble attacks on GG and of course all the other writers and
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#256
Me too apparently, even tho I didn't know it because I have been the same liberal for forty years
Dragonfli
Jul 2013
#259
Lol, I know what you mean. When I was little, I was told to always consider the source
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#260
Why? Under the AUMF of 9/18/2001 Awlaki was no more entitled to a trial than
msanthrope
Jul 2013
#309
Awlaki was a combatant....he was planning and directing terrorist attacks. Under
msanthrope
Jul 2013
#311
It is inappropriate to apply the same criteria used to define WWII "Combatants" with criminals.
Maedhros
Jul 2013
#312
It's not inappropriate...it's the law. Upheld repeatedly. However, for the sake of
msanthrope
Jul 2013
#314
That wasn't the question. Franken has lavished praise on Rand Paul and is his sponsor in the
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#289
But being anti-war, anti-surveillance-state, anti-crony-capitalism and anti-drug-war are good things
Maedhros
Jul 2013
#297
Can you point out anything that is incorrect in that statement?? Have you checked Paul's voting
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#307
And just because you DON'T agree with all the Democrats who have worked with and praised
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#317
Thank you, you saved me the trouble. I see the goal posts have moved, no apology for spreading
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#306
Lol, and the actual polls show that they are not. Two major polls this week show that now
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#283
Dick Cheney isn't a malevolent puppet-master? Since when? Did he have a 'change of heart', well
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#322