Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
15. I'm going to go against the grain here
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 11:48 PM
Jul 2013

I've read the thread to date. I've read everyone congratulating you for your diligence, your efforts, and even astounded that this bugger is a police man. I've even read the predictions of your getting the charges dropped re: Proof of insurance.

I'm going to go the other way. I bet the Judge takes the Cops word, no matter how worthless it is, over yours and finds you guilty of both charges. With a lawyer, you have a slightly better chance, but to prove that you showed him your card on the phone, you'll need the tape from the car, presuming that there is one. To get that, and get it introduced to evidence, assuming the Judge will view it, will take some legal maneuvering.

It isn't enough that the cop is a lying bastard, and the record shows it. The Judges automatically believe the cops over the citizens, no matter how many citizens all swear they saw the same thing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So, this scumbag is an Arizona State Trooper? TheDebbieDee Jul 2013 #1
I'm white. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #2
Also, he's Highway Patrol. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #4
Good job. Just imagine all the DevonRex Jul 2013 #3
He was accused of excessive force in 2009 against a minor. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #5
Jesus. I'm glad you got out of there DevonRex Jul 2013 #6
He also caused a "preventable car accident". I'm trying to find that report right now. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #8
preventable car accident is a phrase that covers a multitude, it could be he backed into something loli phabay Jul 2013 #12
you should win on the insurance ticket but you will probuably lose on the speed loli phabay Jul 2013 #7
I'm not actually sure as I was not looking at my speedometer. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #9
if your honest when you go to court, the judge will drop the insurance ticket loli phabay Jul 2013 #11
I am not so optimistic about the judge amending the speed to 70. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #13
from experience if you just use facts the judge should drop the insurance ticket loli phabay Jul 2013 #14
Nice work citizen! Sincerely. Boom Sound 416 Jul 2013 #10
I'm going to go against the grain here Savannahmann Jul 2013 #15
There was no audio, video or officer notes. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #16
Then it comes down to your word versus his. Savannahmann Jul 2013 #18
I've been to court before. I know I will probably lose on the speeding ticket. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #20
I have a good friend who is a judge and when his daughter was cited with a speeding ticket grantcart Jul 2013 #21
It was VASCAR. It is not required to undergo calibration testing. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #22
I edited while you responded and added some more comments as well - good luck grantcart Jul 2013 #23
Did you get the tickets dismissed? (nt) apnu Jul 2013 #17
I have court on Monday. Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So that officer with the ...»Reply #15