Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)What's your view on jury nullification? [View all]
By which I mean, when a juror deviates from the jury instructions supplied by the judge and instead applies their own conscience. For example, someone using medical marijuana might be technically guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but a juror could nonetheless vote to acquit if they believe that the law is unjust. Or a juror might believe someone is guilty of murder, but lacking reasonable doubt per the jury instructions, might vote to convict anyway.
| 11 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
| I always oppose jury nullification. The judge's instructions to the jury should always be followed to the letter. | |
2 (18%) |
|
| I support jury nullification in certain circumstances when used to acquit a defendant, but not to convict a defendant. | |
8 (73%) |
|
| I support jury nullification in certain circumstances both to acquit a defendant AND to convict a defendant. | |
1 (9%) |
|
| 0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When you are an aggressive, bigot with a gun, you shouldn't be able to twist the law and get off.
Hoyt
Jul 2013
#4
OK, because of the Zimmerman case we have had DUers call for the end of the jury system,
Nye Bevan
Jul 2013
#6
Interesting. I thought jury nullification only worked one way - that is, acquittal, not conviction.
reformist2
Jul 2013
#10
nope - "A jury can similarly convict a defendant on the ground of disagreement with an existing law"
DrDan
Jul 2013
#19
A jury that convicts without a law isn't really nullifying, it's making up its own law, imo.
reformist2
Jul 2013
#13
It's true. Convicting contrary to the state meeting its burden is not jury nullification
morningfog
Jul 2013
#15