Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Starry Messenger

(32,381 posts)

27. Owning shares doesn't make you Boug, unless you have a controlling interest.

Reply to Igel (Reply #14)

Fri Jul 26, 2013, 02:50 AM

Jul 2013

"The ideology that requires the term "bourgeoisie" carries on. The social and economic milieu that it applied to is gone."

Wrong. The bourgeoisie control every aspect of our lives. Private interests control the commanding heights of the economy & the FIRE sector, and are attempting with great success to gain ownership of all aspects of resources built with social capital.

The wealth of the 1% is more greatly contracted to a few than in any other point in history. Start-ups here in Silicon Valley now all "start" with a business plan that plans on getting bought up by one of the big companies. Monopolize or die is the name of the game.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What is Bourgeoisie [View all] DonCoquixote Jul 2013 OP

I was taught the middle class hence octoberlib Jul 2013 #1

The fact you say "some say" should answer your question. former9thward Jul 2013 #2

baloney. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #13

it is not a dead word PowerToThePeople Jul 2013 #15

Bourgeoisie are "townsmen" - haele Jul 2013 #3

bourg = owners of capital. a lawyer who has his own practice is (small) bourg. a lawyer HiPointDem Jul 2013 #12

it means the ownership class. there's big (national/international bourgeoisie and small local HiPointDem Jul 2013 #4

Would you normally also include the "professions"? PETRUS Jul 2013 #5

not unless they own their own practices. and these days, docs who own their own practices HiPointDem Jul 2013 #8

Good point. Best doc I ever had worked at a practice owned by another physician. nt PETRUS Jul 2013 #11

This is what I've always believed the word meant. Laffy Kat Jul 2013 #7

The ownership class. Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #6

middle class nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #9

It's "The" Bourgeoisie NoPasaran Jul 2013 #10

A term used more for relating people to other social groups than anything else. Igel Jul 2013 #14

your son's investments don't make him bourg. pseudo-ownership without control. similarly, a worker HiPointDem Jul 2013 #16

Owning shares doesn't make you Boug, unless you have a controlling interest. Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #27

This message was self-deleted by its author TransitJohn Jul 2013 #17

Most of the people on this board. nt rrneck Jul 2013 #18

Bullshit. Or else they lie about their income during the DU polls.... socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 #19

I recall a post from Skinner rrneck Jul 2013 #20

Ok, this gets to why i asked the question DonCoquixote Jul 2013 #23

There is a distinction between the grande bourgeoisie and the petite bourgeoisie. rug Jul 2013 #21

there you go arely staircase Jul 2013 #26

It's used many ways at different times Recursion Jul 2013 #22

Marx used it to describe the middle class of his era BainsBane Jul 2013 #24

Depends on whether you're talking to a college freshman or someone with actual knowledge... Gravitycollapse Jul 2013 #25

Anyone who has a retirement fund, technically. joshcryer Jul 2013 #28

Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2013 #29

An anachronistic term Proud Public Servant Jul 2013 #30