Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
11. Tax the high frequency trading
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 10:17 AM
Jul 2013

The middle class doesn't generally indulge in day trading or flipping stocks 20 times a minute.

The point is to promote buy-to-hold, like the better mutual funds and Warren Buffet (Democratic party supporter) without reducing liquidity. Taxing High Frequency Trading would do that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Our president should not be criticized. East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #1
Badda boom! 7962 Jul 2013 #3
Can we please stop the meta-discussions and meta-threads? Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #4
Why don't you rein in your own spammers and see what happens? n/t Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #18
I don't own any spammers. Further, you don't know which side I'm on. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #28
Of course I do. You have made no attempt to hide your positions. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #29
Ok, enough hijacking. Message me who my "confederates" are. I don't have any "confederates". Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #31
How is this a criticism of Obama? (nt) Recursion Jul 2013 #32
I would agree with this if it were applied to HFT 7962 Jul 2013 #2
Right. I'm generally against FTTs but HFT is way out of hand. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #5
I think the tax could be tailored to go for HFT and large volume traders.... Junkdrawer Jul 2013 #13
+1 Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #14
I admit I am biased against short sellers 7962 Jul 2013 #19
If I'm taxed for school clothes, why shouldn't I be taked for a stock purchase? michigandem58 Jul 2013 #6
School clothes are sold only once. Stocks are sold & resold many times. Taxing reduces liquidity. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #7
More stock transactions are made on behalf of wealthier Americans michigandem58 Jul 2013 #9
Tax the high frequency trading Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #11
You are completely at odds with the op, I'm confused. toby jo Jul 2013 #10
The figure of "A Quadrillion Dollars" is not wealth, it is volume. Yes, you're confused. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #12
And therein lies the problem; not enough knowledge of the markets 7962 Jul 2013 #15
Excellent Insight Bunnahabhain Jul 2013 #22
School clothes can be resold over and over. Rex Jul 2013 #17
Oh come on now. Not in the retail market they cant. 7962 Jul 2013 #21
They can be, but aren't (be real). When they are (once) it's a private non-taxed transaction. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #23
I've bought plenty of second hand clothes from the salvation army. Rex Jul 2013 #25
You COULD make the argument that they are, though, 7962 Jul 2013 #35
True never thought about that but you can hold the actual certificate Rex Jul 2013 #38
Not really, the stock and the tax are separate 7962 Jul 2013 #39
Because the casino system has replaced investment. Taxing all transactions would push people Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #20
It would be so easy whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #8
Wait. They don't pay any fees for transactions? Rex Jul 2013 #16
Re: Wait. They don't pay any fees for transactions? Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #24
Yeah not all of us have money to invest or a 401k Rex Jul 2013 #26
I didn't assume you have money to invest. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #27
+1 Bunnahabhain Jul 2013 #40
What financial transaction tax rate would be appropriate? Piedras Jul 2013 #30
.25% is the most commonly floated figure. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #34
Cant agree with you on the last part 7962 Jul 2013 #36
I couldn't have demonstrated the point any more clearly if I were Samuel Clemens. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #37
Great points. Elect a House who will pass a FTT (nt) Recursion Jul 2013 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 Reasons It's Just Absur...»Reply #11