Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What would have been the downside of ending the filibuster since Democrats RARELY used in minority? [View all]Cleita
(75,480 posts)36. I can't disagree.
I grew up with dual citizenship, USA and Chile. When I came of age, my American father told me I would have to choose which country I wanted to be a citizen of before I turned 21. I chose the USA for those reasons you outlined and the fact that American women had many more legal rights than Chilean women did at that time even in the fifties.
Frankly, if I had chosen Chile, I wouldn't have had to work as hard and would have had a close family life. I did not choose what our country is turning into today domestically.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What would have been the downside of ending the filibuster since Democrats RARELY used in minority? [View all]
yurbud
Jul 2013
OP
This isn't the old, familiar center-right Republican party -- this is increasingly
pnwmom
Jul 2013
#3
yep. Like their spending like a drunken sailor on weekend pass and cutting taxes for the rich during
yurbud
Jul 2013
#10
a related question: when will demographics make it impossible for them to get a majority in Senate?
yurbud
Jul 2013
#16
Somebody'd have to be way smarter than me, math wise, to crunch the numbers.for that timeframe
Mc Mike
Jul 2013
#20
the disgust was not necessarily at the compromises, but when they came in the process
yurbud
Jul 2013
#23
as Obama demonstrated again today by making a mostly conservative tax proposal that conservatives
yurbud
Jul 2013
#42
which ironically would IMPROVE Dems chances in 14 more than the "Business Party WITHOUT Nuts" tack
yurbud
Jul 2013
#45
It wouldn't take much of our military to occupy the Cayman Islands, Seychelles, or wherever the
yurbud
Jul 2013
#26
The hacker idea is excellent. Give the gang over at NSA something positive to do
Mc Mike
Jul 2013
#32
just as there have been whistleblowers and leakers who have gone off the reservation...
yurbud
Jul 2013
#37
Redford's crew did something like that, at the end of the movie 'Sneakers', I remember.
Mc Mike
Jul 2013
#38
that's the kind of thing I thought of--give it all to charities and even fake an email that
yurbud
Jul 2013
#41
It would seem more logical to call for better leadership than for disarming the inept leader.
JVS
Jul 2013
#8
They won't end it because it makes a convenient excuse for passing corporate legislation.
Marr
Jul 2013
#18
"Leadership" will need to come up with new excuses for corporate taint licking, selling us out,
TheKentuckian
Jul 2013
#19
yeah--but it's not like they don't know that, too. And they just aren't afraid of it.
librechik
Jul 2013
#35