General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Something that has always bothered me: Moralizing. [View all]gollygee
(22,336 posts)because I honestly don't particularly care I guess. Maybe that's sad, but I'm more outraged about the whole Zimmerman thing and this just isn't hitting my radar when the Zimmerman thing is taking up my capacity for outrage.
So I'm not up on just what he did. I heard he texted women photos of his penis - women who never said they were interested or wanted that kind of attention? Is that right? I don't honestly know and I might be piecing together unrelated bits of stuff and I might just be confused, but if he did that then that is sexual harassment and is against the law. If he only texted women who indicated they were interested, then that's another matter. But it isn't OK or neutral or irrelevant if he's harassing random women.
I guess it depends on what he specifically did.
I don't think people should not be allowed to hold office because of legal but questionable sexual choices. If their choices appear to be misogynist, then it might make me personally chose not to vote for them, and I hope other people would make that same choice, but I don't like making people's sexual choices more important than what they actually did in their duties as an elected official.