Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

7962

(11,841 posts)
36. Cant agree with you on the last part
Sat Jul 27, 2013, 09:26 AM
Jul 2013

Holding for a year is long enough to discourage day trading and the likes. And doubling the cap gain rate would discourage even MORE people from getting invested in the market, leaving the field even more open to only the rich.
I am not rich and I can tell you from experience that i've made decisions based on whether or not the tax would be 10% (which is gone now) or my regular rate. Doing that sometimes makes you make a wrong choice. In my case, I didnt make a trade in order to get the lower long-term rate and the govt had to wait to get a 6K tax payment. The higher tax discourages you from making the sale, and the govt gets nothing. We should set a rate that ENCOURAGES sales which in turn generates more total tax revenue to the govt. Its been shown to be true with regard to the stock market.
Compare it to a speeding ticket. If you only had to pay 10.00 if you got caught speeding, you wouldnt worry very much about it. But when the cops start charging 150.00 you pay a lot closer attention to how fast youre going.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Our president should not be criticized. East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #1
Badda boom! 7962 Jul 2013 #3
Can we please stop the meta-discussions and meta-threads? Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #4
Why don't you rein in your own spammers and see what happens? n/t Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #18
I don't own any spammers. Further, you don't know which side I'm on. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #28
Of course I do. You have made no attempt to hide your positions. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #29
Ok, enough hijacking. Message me who my "confederates" are. I don't have any "confederates". Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #31
How is this a criticism of Obama? (nt) Recursion Jul 2013 #32
I would agree with this if it were applied to HFT 7962 Jul 2013 #2
Right. I'm generally against FTTs but HFT is way out of hand. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #5
I think the tax could be tailored to go for HFT and large volume traders.... Junkdrawer Jul 2013 #13
+1 Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #14
I admit I am biased against short sellers 7962 Jul 2013 #19
If I'm taxed for school clothes, why shouldn't I be taked for a stock purchase? michigandem58 Jul 2013 #6
School clothes are sold only once. Stocks are sold & resold many times. Taxing reduces liquidity. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #7
More stock transactions are made on behalf of wealthier Americans michigandem58 Jul 2013 #9
Tax the high frequency trading Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #11
You are completely at odds with the op, I'm confused. toby jo Jul 2013 #10
The figure of "A Quadrillion Dollars" is not wealth, it is volume. Yes, you're confused. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #12
And therein lies the problem; not enough knowledge of the markets 7962 Jul 2013 #15
Excellent Insight Bunnahabhain Jul 2013 #22
School clothes can be resold over and over. Rex Jul 2013 #17
Oh come on now. Not in the retail market they cant. 7962 Jul 2013 #21
They can be, but aren't (be real). When they are (once) it's a private non-taxed transaction. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #23
I've bought plenty of second hand clothes from the salvation army. Rex Jul 2013 #25
You COULD make the argument that they are, though, 7962 Jul 2013 #35
True never thought about that but you can hold the actual certificate Rex Jul 2013 #38
Not really, the stock and the tax are separate 7962 Jul 2013 #39
Because the casino system has replaced investment. Taxing all transactions would push people Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #20
It would be so easy whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #8
Wait. They don't pay any fees for transactions? Rex Jul 2013 #16
Re: Wait. They don't pay any fees for transactions? Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #24
Yeah not all of us have money to invest or a 401k Rex Jul 2013 #26
I didn't assume you have money to invest. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2013 #27
+1 Bunnahabhain Jul 2013 #40
What financial transaction tax rate would be appropriate? Piedras Jul 2013 #30
.25% is the most commonly floated figure. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #34
Cant agree with you on the last part 7962 Jul 2013 #36
I couldn't have demonstrated the point any more clearly if I were Samuel Clemens. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #37
Great points. Elect a House who will pass a FTT (nt) Recursion Jul 2013 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 Reasons It's Just Absur...»Reply #36