Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Boojatta

(12,231 posts)
22. I don't think that this is an argument against minimum wage.
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 02:14 PM
Feb 2012
His argument is that minimum wage hurts teenage employment. He argues that employers do not see teenagers as worth minimum wage so they avoid hiring them as much as possible. It hurts them in the long-run because not landing them that first job (because gaining the experience of being in a work place is crucial to future employment and learning how a work place works) will hurt them in the long run.

Does your debate opponent agree that there is minimum wage legislation that applies to nannies, agricultural workers, and people who work at jobs that customarily provide gratuities (e.g. waiters and waitresses)?

If the answer is "yes", then admittedly minimum wage legislation allows for the possibility that there is not necessarily a one-size-fits-all minimum wage level. In particular, there could be a lower minimum wage for people who have little workplace experience.

If the answer is "no", then please post in this thread some details about any information that is provided along with the "no" answer.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What would be a strong academic argument [View all] in venere veritas Feb 2012 OP
That fascist sympathizer, Henry Ford. WingDinger Feb 2012 #1
I will have to use this one in venere veritas Feb 2012 #6
It is a a race to the bottom. As it is, the minimum wage is morningfog Feb 2012 #2
His argument is in venere veritas Feb 2012 #4
If one is arguing to abolish minimum wage, it is disingenuous to use morningfog Feb 2012 #7
I greatly appreciate your help in venere veritas Feb 2012 #11
He's wrong right off...where does he get his "facts" that employers joeybee12 Feb 2012 #16
He trys to argue that "fact"(as in right-wing reality) in venere veritas Feb 2012 #19
I don't think that this is an argument against minimum wage. Boojatta Feb 2012 #22
My assumption is that he in venere veritas Feb 2012 #28
It is not a natural law that the economy will cthulu2016 Feb 2012 #3
Personally in venere veritas Feb 2012 #5
Good point! Boojatta Feb 2012 #24
Several bongbong Feb 2012 #8
Unrelated, but I noticed your avatar is Oklahoma in venere veritas Feb 2012 #10
On your point #2: surrealAmerican Feb 2012 #14
This is someone elses arguement and I do not remember who but there has never been a libertarian jwirr Feb 2012 #15
Get educated bongbong Feb 2012 #21
Yeah in venere veritas Feb 2012 #25
Re "monopoly laws will prevent that" Boojatta Feb 2012 #23
I'm not exactly sure in venere veritas Feb 2012 #26
The economic prosperity of the high-wage high-tax 1950s vs. Bruce Wayne Feb 2012 #9
I like that second one in venere veritas Feb 2012 #12
check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage spooky3 Feb 2012 #13
I'd just give the libertarian the finger and walk away. MineralMan Feb 2012 #17
+1 renie408 Feb 2012 #18
lol. is there a weak argument to defend the minimum wage? La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #20
people have to eat. spanone Feb 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What would be a strong ac...»Reply #22