Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Boojatta

(12,231 posts)
23. Re "monopoly laws will prevent that"
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 01:49 PM
Feb 2012
2. His argument is monopoly laws will prevent that. Companies will have to compete for labor.

Some Marxist-Leninists have said that their economic plan will fail unless they can change the economic system of the whole world. Is your debating opponent also taking that kind of position, or is he proposing something that he thinks would be feasible in America if implemented only in America?

Also, is your debating opponent focus exclusively on jobs that cannot be moved offshore?

Consider wage levels in China at current exchange rates. I presume that the "monopoly" argument is that people can start companies in China and get all the employees they need by offering wages that are higher than the prevailing wages in China. Okay, if you can design and market products as successfully as Apple, then you have a business model. However, that's not a very interesting conclusion. If you want to provide manufacturing under contract to Apple, then how do you persuade Apple to pay you more than Apple is currently paying to Foxconn?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What would be a strong academic argument [View all] in venere veritas Feb 2012 OP
That fascist sympathizer, Henry Ford. WingDinger Feb 2012 #1
I will have to use this one in venere veritas Feb 2012 #6
It is a a race to the bottom. As it is, the minimum wage is morningfog Feb 2012 #2
His argument is in venere veritas Feb 2012 #4
If one is arguing to abolish minimum wage, it is disingenuous to use morningfog Feb 2012 #7
I greatly appreciate your help in venere veritas Feb 2012 #11
He's wrong right off...where does he get his "facts" that employers joeybee12 Feb 2012 #16
He trys to argue that "fact"(as in right-wing reality) in venere veritas Feb 2012 #19
I don't think that this is an argument against minimum wage. Boojatta Feb 2012 #22
My assumption is that he in venere veritas Feb 2012 #28
It is not a natural law that the economy will cthulu2016 Feb 2012 #3
Personally in venere veritas Feb 2012 #5
Good point! Boojatta Feb 2012 #24
Several bongbong Feb 2012 #8
Unrelated, but I noticed your avatar is Oklahoma in venere veritas Feb 2012 #10
On your point #2: surrealAmerican Feb 2012 #14
This is someone elses arguement and I do not remember who but there has never been a libertarian jwirr Feb 2012 #15
Get educated bongbong Feb 2012 #21
Yeah in venere veritas Feb 2012 #25
Re "monopoly laws will prevent that" Boojatta Feb 2012 #23
I'm not exactly sure in venere veritas Feb 2012 #26
The economic prosperity of the high-wage high-tax 1950s vs. Bruce Wayne Feb 2012 #9
I like that second one in venere veritas Feb 2012 #12
check this out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage spooky3 Feb 2012 #13
I'd just give the libertarian the finger and walk away. MineralMan Feb 2012 #17
+1 renie408 Feb 2012 #18
lol. is there a weak argument to defend the minimum wage? La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2012 #20
people have to eat. spanone Feb 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What would be a strong ac...»Reply #23