Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Oregon woman awarded $18.6 million after Equifax failed to fix errors on her credit report [View all]
Sat Jul 27, 2013 at 02:51 PM PDT
Oregon woman awarded $18.6 million after Equifax failed to fix errors on her credit report
by Christian Dem in NCFollow
Back in 2009, Julie Miller of Marion County, Oregon (Salem), was denied credit by a bank due to an erroneous credit rating from Equifax. She spent almost three years trying to get Equifax to fix the mistake, but Equifax refused. So naturally, Miller sued. Yesterday, a federal jury in Portland ordered Equifax to pay Miller $18.6 million in damages--$18.4 million in punitive damages and $180,000 in actual damages. It is believed to be one of the largest judgments ever imposed against a major credit bureau.
(Miller) contacted Equifax eight times between 2009 and 2011 in an effort to correct inaccuracies, including erroneous accounts and collection attempts, as well as a wrong Social Security number and birthday. Yet over and over, the lawsuit alleged, the Atlanta-based company failed to correct its mistakes.
"There was damage to her reputation, a breach of her privacy and the lost opportunity to seek credit," said Justin Baxter, the Portland attorney who teamed on the case with his father and law partner, Michael Baxter. "She has a brother who is disabled and who can't get credit on his own and she wasn't able to help him."
"There was damage to her reputation, a breach of her privacy and the lost opportunity to seek credit," said Justin Baxter, the Portland attorney who teamed on the case with his father and law partner, Michael Baxter. "She has a brother who is disabled and who can't get credit on his own and she wasn't able to help him."
The Oregonian got its hands on Miller's original complaint. Read it here. It alleges that on at least three occasions, Equifax failed to even investigate Miller's claims of errors on her report. On the times it did investigate, it failed to make changes despite the obvious errors. Miller also charged that Equifax failed to send her a copy of her credit report at least twice, even though credit bureaus are required by law to provide one free credit report per year to a customer upon request. Miller claimed she was denied credit at least one other time due to the errors, and was also unable to help her disabled brother.
As it turned out, the errors came because someone at Equifax placed information from another Julie Miller into the plaintiff's record. Apparently Equifax was so lazy that it sent the plaintiff's financial information to companies asking about the other Julie Miller. Although Equifax is appealing, now it's staring down the barrel of having to pay several times what it would have cost to simply fix the problem--though more than likely it'll be less than the initial bill for $18.6 million.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/07/27/1227071/-Oregon-woman-awarded-18-6-million-after-Equifax-failed-to-fix-errors-on-her-credit-report
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oregon woman awarded $18.6 million after Equifax failed to fix errors on her credit report [View all]
FourScore
Jul 2013
OP
Exactly, I think one of the quick fixes for many of our economic problems would be to...
rwsanders
Jul 2013
#30
It is these credt agencies that will be deciding your eligibility for Obamacare
Demeter
Jul 2013
#19
An accident, a serious illness, a layoff, etc. can turn people into "deadbeats" pretty quickly.
Arugula Latte
Jul 2013
#61
I am sorry, I dont understand. These agencies wield a lot of power. If that power is
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#41
I disagree. There have been numerous lawsuit wins against the Big Three. They don't change.
Kennah
Jul 2013
#43
they keep super accurate records of the elites . politicians, celebrities, and the 1%
Liberal_in_LA
Jul 2013
#38
How about a new law that requires substantial or compelling reasons for a court to adjust jury
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2013
#11
My father and I have the same name. Just after my parent's divorce, his credit was awful.
Thor_MN
Jul 2013
#17
I had a similar experience. It led me to the conclusion that credit scores are total BS.
VPStoltz
Jul 2013
#24
We get downgraded because we have ONE credit card that we pay in full each month
SoCalDem
Jul 2013
#40
never been in debt except for a mortgage, don't use credit, never had even a late bill. but
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#46
Good. But they will immediately move for the judge to reduce the award or for a new trial.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#31
yes, let's not name children after their parents because that makes life harder for the incompetent
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#45
"a recipe for disaster" because they hire careless workers- or have poor checks and balances?
bettyellen
Jul 2013
#53
If you're going to run a gossip sheet for bankers, you'd better check your facts. nt
eppur_se_muova
Jul 2013
#42
I had this happen when I applied for the loan you get for the 3 month period between the end of law
Dustlawyer
Jul 2013
#50
Great! But I seriously doubt she will ever receive her judgement in that amount. nt
NorthCarolina
Jul 2013
#56
Ok, but again, there is not a Fourth Amendment issue, and you do not seem to be arguing otherwise.
tritsofme
Jul 2013
#85
I repeat once again, what does this have to do with the 4th Amendment? Thanks.
tritsofme
Jul 2013
#87