Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to tularetom (Reply #15)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

de jure, no; de facto, yes. nt delrem Jul 2013 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #7
First answer is the correct answer. nt means no text, there's nothing in the body of the reply. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #18
nt or n/t = "no text". nt heh delrem Jul 2013 #20
What does 'nt heh' mean? :) - nt (heh :) HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #13
No, he not going to be arrested. former9thward Jul 2013 #19
I don't think so, I think so, and there's no fucking way tularetom Jul 2013 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #5
I mean no matter WTF he's guilty of, THIS administration won't do squat about it tularetom Jul 2013 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #16
perhaps he'll partake in some med maryjane elehhhhna Jul 2013 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #9
I guess that's what I mean tularetom Jul 2013 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #17
POTUS like any other LEO had limited personal immunity Recursion Jul 2013 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #6
I was taking about what he did while President Recursion Jul 2013 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #10
Well, he's rich and famous Recursion Jul 2013 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #14
G H W Bush is the only ex-President, who reads the daily briefings iemitsu Jul 2013 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #52
You have my compassion and goodwill in your fight against the powerful Bush Crime Family. iemitsu Jul 2013 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #54
Yep, I am for the "equal justice for all" policy that we so often iemitsu Jul 2013 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #61
Sounds like they have really given you the run-a-round. iemitsu Jul 2013 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #69
Thanks for the link to the evidence. iemitsu Jul 2013 #77
when the director of the cia becomes president, it can't be good spanone Jul 2013 #68
You got that one right, iemitsu Jul 2013 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #71
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #72
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #74
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #76
It is very unlikely that a former president of the USA would ever face criminal prosecution. branford Jul 2013 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #22
I'm not quite sure what you're trying to state. branford Jul 2013 #31
As long as he was not given a blanket pardon for acts in office, yes to both. Agnosticsherbet Jul 2013 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #24
After Democrats took control of the House in 2006, talk about impeachment and investigations shrunk Agnosticsherbet Jul 2013 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #25
I think the "anyone" is an enormous overreach. Agnosticsherbet Jul 2013 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #29
Probably got a secret pardon already elehhhhna Jul 2013 #50
Bill Clinton could not give Bush a pardon because he was not in office Agnosticsherbet Jul 2013 #56
I think there is a reluctance to do this for fear we'll end up being a country pnwmom Jul 2013 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #30
You don't think we'd have bogus prosecutions? pnwmom Jul 2013 #37
I very much agree. branford Jul 2013 #32
Welcome to DU, branford! n/t pnwmom Jul 2013 #35
Thank you. branford Jul 2013 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #36
I am in no way stating that politicians are immune to criminal prosecution. branford Jul 2013 #39
GWB and Cheney should be investigated, indicted and tried for war crimes and HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #75
You may be right. branford Jul 2013 #78
Thank you for your balanced and civil tone. With reference to your second paragraph, the HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #79
You raise many substantive and relevant points. branford Jul 2013 #80
A magisterial response to my late-night fantasy. As perhaps a historical HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #81
Interesting. branford Jul 2013 #82
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #38
You Nixon reference fails to address the OP or our discussion. branford Jul 2013 #41
1) There is a 5-year statute of limitations. 2) He has and has had de facto immunity from Obama. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #33
I've asked this before and I'll ask again... brooklynite Jul 2013 #34
You say that "no elected official" called for Bush's impeachment? Do you remember this guy? AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #44
Huh???? branford Jul 2013 #45
I stand corrected --- and you've made my point brooklynite Jul 2013 #47
Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL) was one. It would be necessary to use Google to find others. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #49
Thank you for remembering this. nt LWolf Jul 2013 #57
Amen. Thank you. branford Jul 2013 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #46
I checked out your blog rusty fender Jul 2013 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #59
I hear you rusty fender Jul 2013 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jul 2013 #65
The Florida Bar Associate Cannot Indict Anyone branford Jul 2013 #67
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Aug 2013 #83
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Sep 2013 #84
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Sep 2013 #85
This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Jun 2014 #86
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #17