General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Already, another Trayvon Martin incident has just happened [View all]krispos42
(49,445 posts)But, she could be a victim of your side's desire to severely punish anybody that mishandles or misuses a gun.
From the law's point of view, she recklessly discharged a firearm inside city limits. Inside a house. Now, I'm sure you know that bullets can penetrate walls and hit innocent victims, so obviously people that discharge guns in crowded urban or suburban areas need to be severely punished, right?
Also from the law's point of view, if she was really in life-threatening danger, she wouldn't have fired a warning shot, right? If she was in life-threatening danger, she should have shot him instead.
So, from the law's point of view, she wasn't in danger enough yet. After all, we only want justifiable homicide when there's really a reasonable believe of imminent threat of death or grievous bodily harm, right? We don't want people to shoot people just because "they feel threatened", right?