General Discussion

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)

266. No, actually, it was the 'lawyer' who didn't understand the standard procedure

Mon Jul 29, 2013, 06:26 AM

Jul 2013

of the NY State Bar Assoc when a lawyer changes careers.

It happens often, the procedure is standard, the lawyer generally doesn't pay the fees for something s/he won't be using. IF the lawyer, and I've known a few, decides to go back into law, s/he goes through the standard process, pays the fees, and is back in business.

It is astounding that anyone claiming to be a lawyer here is so unfamiliar with something this simple regarding the profession they claim to be in.

Amazing the lack of concern for FACTS and ACCURACY from someone professing to be lawyer.

And equally amazing to watch the creation of a smear campaign right here in this thread. I am very pleased about that, to have it as an example of how it's done was worth its weight in gold.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

342 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Frequently Told Lies' about Glenn Greenwald, by Glenn Greenwald. [View all] sabrina 1 Jul 2013 OP

"I supported the Iraq War and/or George Bush " ProSense Jul 2013 #1

Thanks for an example of one of the six lies. You are free to read the correction made by sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #3

"as soon as he knew we were lied to" ProSense Jul 2013 #12

Why didn't all those Democrats, Kerry, Clinton et al, know, and why have they never sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #18

Greenwald is not a member of Congress. I knew it was bullshit. ProSense Jul 2013 #21

And yet you supported for Sec of Defense a Republican who voted for the Iraq War and for Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #31

Again, ProSense Jul 2013 #38

Again, it is unfair and hypocritical on a very basic level to criticize one person for doing that Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #44

Again, Greenwald was gullible is not an excuse. He supported the Iraq war. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #45

And so did Hagel, who you felt was a great choice for Defense Sec. Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #49

Again, ProSense Jul 2013 #50

Hypocritical double standard blather. There is no excuse for it. None. Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #54

Yes, I opposed the war. Greenwald supported it. His excuse is "hypocritical double standard blather" ProSense Jul 2013 #58

You continue to avoid the very obvious fact that Greenwald was a private and unknown sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #262

"Intellectually Void" Android3.14 Jul 2013 #303

Correction: Kerry was against the INVASION of Iraq. He voted for IWR, then when inspectors blm Jul 2013 #80

This message was self-deleted by its author chimpymustgo Jul 2013 #102

chimp, what the hell has gotten into you? Just because you got burned by Edwards doesn't blm Jul 2013 #134

blm, I owe you an apology. I allowed myself get unduly upset yesterday. chimpymustgo Jul 2013 #275

he caved when he picked that miserable failure John Edwards to be VP running mate JI7 Jul 2013 #141

AHAHA...just realized. You're mad because you're a Hillary supporter blm Jul 2013 #145

REDUNDANT (It's linked in the OP) But thank you for illustrating the point usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #196

Has anyone noticed GG has attempted to smear the current adminstration with events Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #2

No, enlighten us please. With some links if possible. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #5

Download the Meet the Press from today, GG was on there today. Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #6

I don't watch the Corporate Media anymore. You made a claim, if you can't provide proof sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #9

The proof was on this morning, if you don't watch corporate media than you are not interested in Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #13

Iow, you cannot prove what you just stated. Fine, it happens. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #15

Can you prove GG was not on Meet the Press this morning? Prove he was not on the show. Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #17

If that was the topic, I would not question something so easily proven. You otoh, are sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #19

You apparently don't like proof GG lies, can't help you, I gave you proof but you don't have proof Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #30

So you lied?? For what purpose? I don't know or care whether he was on MTP or not. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #33

Try this one Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #91

You were mistaken about a lot of things. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #114

Then why did you ask for proof? I wonder if you are interested in the truth but then you have to Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #131

You have absolutely zero credibility. Maedhros Jul 2013 #302

Here's proof Astrad Jul 2013 #55

Sorry got my shows confused, it was This Week Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #93

Oh! FFS! Vanje Jul 2013 #146

Hey, don't worry, keep it up! Next time the shit might stick. delrem Jul 2013 #329

A quote from Henry A Wallace: Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #4

I was going to use that exact same quote Catherina Jul 2013 #20

"The magistrate judge granted both motions, finding defense counsel's conduct unethical under two msanthrope Jul 2013 #7

There it is, right on cue. Thank you for providing exhibit #1 of what Greenwald has sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #10

I am posting a false legal cite? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #16

You are doing what you always do, although it's good to see the lie that he was ever sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #24

Kindly cite, specifically, where I ever claimed he was "sanctioned." He lost the case for his client msanthrope Jul 2013 #26

OMG, a lawyer lost A case??? sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #34

When violate your client's privilege, it's a pretty big deal. Screwing up 26(b)(3), followed by a msanthrope Jul 2013 #43

Yes, that would be serious. Fortunately for his client, that was not the case here. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #263

That is exactly what happened here, which is why the court ruled against him and granted the motion msanthrope Jul 2013 #269

Yes, he lost one case. Is that a crime now, because if it is there are a whole lot of far worse sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #284

K&R MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #8

Another K&R Cleita Jul 2013 #25

so he is lying about the lies he told. Whisp Jul 2013 #11

Really? What lies did he tell? I look forward to discussing the content of the linked sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #14

Well, he's depending on his supporters being too ignorant about the law on #6. msanthrope Jul 2013 #23

in other words, if you can get away with it Whisp Jul 2013 #27

Well, he didn't get away with it. Glenn apparently was dumb enough to wiretap--and make transcripts msanthrope Jul 2013 #40

wow you are hilarious,. so the white supremacist lost,. boo hoo. Civilization2 Jul 2013 #69

Um--the New York Bar thought taping was improper, too. See post 62, referencing Glenn's case. msanthrope Jul 2013 #72

lol "wiretapping",. he was recording a witness by phone,. not tapping it like the NSA does! Civilization2 Jul 2013 #78

Did the witness give permission to be recorded by him? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #110

I know, they are funny, more entertaining than anything on TV. I love this thread. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #237

So.... revmclaren Jul 2013 #321

So you support Government Surveillance of the entire population? sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #331

That's the Senior District Judge's opinion as to character. OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #97

Lol, are you serious? We know the law, we know the law differs from state to state, sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #28

Ahem---so wiretapping a witness is okay? Because that's not what this court found. msanthrope Jul 2013 #35

oh, I think I just took an arrow to the ironknee... Whisp Jul 2013 #46

Not just wiretapping a witness--making a transcript of it and being stupid enough to msanthrope Jul 2013 #51

Except that is a lie. But don't let that bother you. I notice you haven't taken my invitation sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #52

Taping in NY was improper, too. Here's the NY State Bar Opinion, citing Glenn's case: msanthrope Jul 2013 #62

I live in NY and have spent hours in NY courts and this was not just legal it was well sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #63

Okay--so after being shown the NY State Bar Opinion that contradicts you, you say wiretapping msanthrope Jul 2013 #67

The NY Bar? Lol, do you know the reputation of the NH Bar when it comes to sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #71

The NY Bar where Mr. Greenwald's license is suspended? Like I said, Sabrina, your defense of wire- msanthrope Jul 2013 #74

Now you really are reaching a new low. Greenwald's license was NEVER suspended, he sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #76

So now the NY State Bar computer is lying???? Take a look-- msanthrope Jul 2013 #83

This truly is shameful. What a totally transparent example of how propaganda is applied. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #95

I have no idea why he is 'suspended' as opposed to 'resigned.' If I were winding up a law practice msanthrope Jul 2013 #103

You would know if you wanted to know. All you had to was to read the OP linked article. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #109

No--he is not "in good standing." He is "suspended." I am sure he has a very good reason msanthrope Jul 2013 #115

He is in good standing, all he has to do is pay the fee if he ever decides to return to sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #117

No--Mr. Greenwald would not qualify for a Certificate of Good Standing: msanthrope Jul 2013 #132

You have the wisdom of Solomon and the patience of Job. Seriously Number23 Jul 2013 #159

I thank you, my fellow persona.*** msanthrope Jul 2013 #168

I'm wading through DU now. And I'm seeing thread after thread about sock puppet hysteria Number23 Jul 2013 #170

It's the online equivalent of looking for the black helicopters. It's actually pretty funny. msanthrope Jul 2013 #176

He is in excellent standing. Your concern for him is touching though. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #286

they sound like cultists, worshippers, and apologists to me.... sweet bebe jesuS GG... dionysus Jul 2013 #84

"Personas" seem to be new insult. Paid by the NSA, I think. Did you get your check? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #86

yes.. 5 billion.. dollars.. dionysus Jul 2013 #105

The NSA pays well, eh? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #108

And there it is again, the old 'worship' talking point. I'll tell you what I respect, JOURNALISM sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #112

Is the NY State Bar computer in on the conspiracy to smear Mr. Greenwald? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #116

The NY State Bar computer correctly informed the public that Greenwald is not practicing law sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #127

Attorneys who are suspended are not allowed to practice law in NY State. If this was voluntary msanthrope Jul 2013 #136

Lol, thanks again for the display of how these smears are created. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #137

I don't think an accurate computer listing of one's status is a 'smear.' msanthrope Jul 2013 #138

Again, thanks for this demonstration of how lies and smears are made. But once again, sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #147

This might be the funniest thing you've written on this thread--- msanthrope Jul 2013 #149

No, definitely not the funniest thing I've ever written. I've written some hilarious stuff. You sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #155

I cannot wait for you tell Glenn Greenwald how the NY State Bar computer is smearing him msanthrope Jul 2013 #158

Why would I do that? He knows what the Bar computer does when someone voluntarily sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #167

Do you have a cite for your claim this is over non-payment of bar fees? msanthrope Jul 2013 #173

Well I'm sorry, but I don't believe any attorney would not know that this is standard sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #177

Um no--it's not standard practice in NY State or anywhere else. In NY State, lawyers who don't msanthrope Jul 2013 #184

Uh yes, it is. As I said, any attorney would know this is standard for the Bar Assoc. to do. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #187

And you've hit the point--"absent anything other than lapsed fees." msanthrope Jul 2013 #192

Getting desperate now, aren't we?? sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #195

They reveal themselves so easily usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #198

Dude, Sabrina just confused a NY legal paper with a British tabloid. msanthrope Jul 2013 #202

YOU are deliberately trying to muddy the waters on GG usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #204

By making wild accusations that people are using British tabloids when they are not? msanthrope Jul 2013 #205

Don't change the subject, you are spreading disinfo to smear a journalist who is doing his job usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #208

I am not the one who brought up British Tabloids...and doesn't Greenwald write for one, anyway? msanthrope Jul 2013 #212

Thank you for illustrating the OP's point so well usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #271

Well, doesn't Greenwald write for The Guardian? I'm not the one who brought up msanthrope Jul 2013 #272

That has absolutely nothing to do with the point usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #273

I agree...which is why I have no idea why Sabrina would bring up British Tabloids in the msanthrope Jul 2013 #276

You're welcome, it is a bit exhausting, but it was worth it to see how it is done. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #203

Sabrina, have you retracted your wild accusation that I was using a British tabloid? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #206

Of course, which you know already. Still trying to distract from the fact that you just spent sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #209

No, I don't answer your questions anymore. I still speak with you because you are useful. msanthrope Jul 2013 #211

The only reason I speak with you is because you are very useful as you were tonight, sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #216

You didn't answer my question about citing your claim that his suspension was over fees... msanthrope Jul 2013 #220

Lol, when losing the battle, try going on the offensive. Lawyer tactic? Possibly or just sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #223

Still can't cite it Sabrina? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #224

The last stand of msanthrope, resort to losing tactic. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #226

Still can't cite it, Sabrina? Where's the cite that Glenn is suspended because he didn't pay fees?nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #230

The NYDaily Record is a legal newspaper, not a British tabloid rag. If you are a court reporter in msanthrope Jul 2013 #200

Yes, my one mistake throughout this very revealing subthread. Thanks for your assistance sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #207

I will tell you what I tell every single DUer who challenges whether or not I am an attorney.... msanthrope Jul 2013 #210

I really don't care what you are. But no attorney would make the false claims you made and sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #213

How easily you back down, Sabrina. Now, I've asked you to cite Mr. Greenwald's claim that his msanthrope Jul 2013 #218

How transparent you are, msanthrope. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #221

Of course you cannot cite the claim that Mr. Greenwald is suspended over fees, can you? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #222

Bad tactic, seriously. Remember, people have read the thread AND the OP. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #225

Still can't cite it Sabrina? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #227

Still trying to save face msathrope? n/t sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #229

Still can't cite your claim? Why not? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #232

And still pretending not to know the answer. I understand, everything. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #233

I'm asking you to show me where Mr. Greenwald says the answer....now, I get that you msanthrope Jul 2013 #235

Still don't know the standard procedures of the NY State Bar Association.n/t sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #238

Again--can you cite your claim that Mr. Greenwald is claiming that his suspension is over fees? msanthrope Jul 2013 #239

Still can't find it in the OP, lol! It's not working, the game. It doesn't distract from sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #242

Hey--if you see it in the OP, why not just copy it and show it? And if you've got a cite msanthrope Jul 2013 #243

It's there. I don't care if you find it or not, sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #247

Well, don't be coy Sabrina! If you've got a part in your OP where Glenn explains why his license is msanthrope Jul 2013 #250

I admit I have encouraged you to demonstrate how little you know about the law. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #251

Which law would that be? Could you cite the law I am apparently in ignorance of? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #253

It wasn't too hard to find the answer to your question. unapatriciated Jul 2013 #261

Thank you---and I think he is not telling the truth. This explanation makes no sense--- msanthrope Jul 2013 #270

Those who don't feel the need to pay for something they are not using and don't intend to use again. unapatriciated Jul 2013 #274

Then there are legal options that do not violate the ethical code one has sworn to. msanthrope Jul 2013 #277

wow, just wow unapatriciated Jul 2013 #279

There is one very good reason, to try to distract and use up time and energy. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #280

Oh, You Are Adorable! Yes Sabrina, You Are The Chosen One! Skraxx Jul 2013 #314

Well, you're going about your mission the wrong way. Lol! sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #315

I'm Simply Unworthy And Ill Equipped To Counter The Brilliance of Your nth Dimensional Skraxx Jul 2013 #317

Interesting metaphors and word choices. Octafish Jul 2013 #316

You've Got Me! I've Been Revealed! Now What? Skraxx Jul 2013 #318

LOL! Not my problem. Octafish Jul 2013 #324

No, I Do Suppose You Have Many More Pressing Problems To Deal With Skraxx Jul 2013 #328

Why not bother? Of what importance do you think these threads are? nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #283

Amazing how little you know about the NY State Bar Assoc. and the standard procedures that sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #282

Just to explain why I refused to comply with the 'request' for a link. I knew the game that was sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #333

Don't be Sorry unapatriciated Jul 2013 #338

Lol, perfect, exactly what I knew you would do if I had entertained your pretense that you sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #332

You've Fully Completed Epistemic Closure! Skraxx Jul 2013 #306

Well, thank you! sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #308

I'll Wait For Your Citations First Skraxx Jul 2013 #309

I support every statement you have made Swagman Jul 2013 #322

your posts sicken me and this is why : Swagman Jul 2013 #320

They may be how your license operates--it is not how a law license operates. msanthrope Jul 2013 #323

Thank you so much for verifying what most people, especially attorneys or other license holders in sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #334

Sad. OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #65

Excuse me?? Please explain this: sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #68

Been working all day. OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #77

Your 'question' was completely unwarranted. I do not know Greenwald other than by his sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #81

Hey, no problem. OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #118

So you have no proof of anything you are speculating about. Here on DU we generally sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #120

Uh huh. OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #128

Oh there are shills here. No doubt about that. And while most of us know who they most sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #129

Thank you for the needed excuse to retire. OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #139

You can't 'snark' period. Don't give up your day job, unlike Greenwald, who was able to sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #143

Also... OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #87

But... Bobbie Jo Jul 2013 #111

If I find out that she's the Queen of Sheba... OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #119

She's threatening to send this ENTIRE thread to Glenn Greenwald! msanthrope Jul 2013 #151

K&R stonecutter357 Jul 2013 #307

No, you missed it, but I already stated upthread somewhere, that i am the Queen of France. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #335

And you gotta love the poster who joined in 2008 attempting to "school" the poster who joined Number23 Jul 2013 #165

Hey, my old friend, I nearly missed thanking you for kicking the thread. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #228

"I'm sorry. Really. But who the fuck are you?" Number23 Jul 2013 #162

The Master Of The Circular Argument. Ikonoklast Jul 2013 #299

Never answer its questions. Never look at its links..and watch it skate in circles. msanthrope Jul 2013 #311

so what you are really saying is unapatriciated Jul 2013 #339

I am extremely sorry about your son. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #340

Where was the 'actual attorney'? I saw a person who claims to be an attorney display a stunning sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #336

LOL! That's Cute! I For One Commend Sabrina on her DU Accomplishments! Skraxx Jul 2013 #313

Do you know how it was "resolved?" Greenwald had to turn over the tapes and transcripts after msanthrope Jul 2013 #70

Got paid for it, too. OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #61

7. He has an exclusive coming out very soon that will shock the world.....nt pkdu Jul 2013 #22

Sure he does. Today it was an exclusive from 2008.....nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #29

SHOCK! Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #59

Very interesting read. Thanks for posting this. Autumn Jul 2013 #32

I first read and respected Greenwald as one of the most cogent, effective and vigorous critics enough Jul 2013 #36

Thank you for your comment. Exactly how a majority of people feel about those who sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #39

I've always referred to them as "frequently repeated lies" stupidicus Jul 2013 #37

He certainly has scared the living daylights out of someone or someones for them to struggle sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #99

you know it sabrina stupidicus Jul 2013 #106

K&R Vinnie From Indy Jul 2013 #41

Thanks for posting this. Greenwald's FTL only reinforces how low the opposition has sunk Catherina Jul 2013 #42

It shows how hard the opposition researchers worked to try to discredit him, and still sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #47

'Frequently Told Lies' about Glenn Greenwald, by Glenn Greenwald? Galraedia Jul 2013 #48

I see you didn't read the OP. Thanks for providing an exhibit of what the OP . sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #53

A man defending himself against accusations is cult like? JoeyT Jul 2013 #57

No, what's cult-like is taking whatever he says as truth just because he says it. Galraedia Jul 2013 #89

My fave FTL from Glenny: UTUSN Jul 2013 #56

Your post is unclear to me. unapatriciated Jul 2013 #267

(Since this thread is still on p. 1, ) And 'tw'll ever be so!1 UTUSN Jul 2013 #278

Glenn Greenwald�s Hilarious Denial About His Support for Iraq War ProSense Jul 2013 #60

DU has the dubious distinction of being the main source of spreading one of those lies Catherina Jul 2013 #64

How shameful, for DU. It's not like anyone takes this small contingency seriously here sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #66

I just clicked through the DU results Catherina Jul 2013 #73

Yes, and that is unfair representation of DU's opinion of all of this. But I guess sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #75

the GG cultists\apologists\worshippers\pop pom crowd\sockpuppets can dionysus Jul 2013 #85

Funny how that works, eh? Whisp Jul 2013 #126

Glen Greenwald is not the issue 99th_Monkey Jul 2013 #79

He's not the issue when it comes to the NSA surveillance program, but when we got to such sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #88

Totally Sabrina. That's how I see it too. ~nt 99th_Monkey Jul 2013 #92

On a thread about Glenn Greenwald, BY Glenn Greenwald OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #122

I'm glad you can appreciate the hilarity of the situation 99th_Monkey Jul 2013 #130

Lol, you can say that again! I have not had this fun in a long time. The gang's all here! sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #231

LOL back at you. :-) eom 99th_Monkey Jul 2013 #236

Thank you. AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2013 #82

Remember that Star Trek episode with Harry Mudd? baldguy Jul 2013 #90

No, wish I did. Maybe you could explain, I am ashamed to admit to not having been a Trekkie. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #96

. baldguy Jul 2013 #101

Lol, good one. Thanks for the link. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #104

After watching that mimi85 Jul 2013 #121

The hate for Glenn is up to 11 today because he's releasing another article that will put neverforget Jul 2013 #94

Yes, but it won't work, the more they attack journalists, the worse they look and the more sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #100

and you guys spew about hero worship... dionysus Jul 2013 #107

'You guys'. Link to a post of mine that ever mentioned 'hero worship'. Thanks, I'll wait. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #113

Mmm, no response, though to be truthful, I didn't expect one. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #234

K&R idwiyo Jul 2013 #98

Ya know who ELSE they used to lie about all the time? OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #123

You are not making much sense here tonight. Breitbart was the liar. And who exactly do sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #124

Not much I hate more than pointing out the obvious... OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #133

As I said, and I will repeat it just for you, 'you are not making much sense here tonight'. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #135

Bravo! You deserve the internet equivalent of a Pulitzer for this thread and HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #125

Lol, thank you! Not sure about a Pulitzer, but the thread sure has helped to prove the whole sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #140

When Greenwalds Attack! 10 Examples From His Past Whisp Jul 2013 #142

Lol, who is this person who thinks he CAN attack someone and not expect a response?? sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #144

you wouldn't be attacking the messenger now, would you? Whisp Jul 2013 #148

No, I wouldn't. I dealt very succinctly with the 'content'. An unknown blogger was linked to sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #153

Glenn Greenwald Supported President Bush As He Signed The Patriot Act! Whisp Jul 2013 #150

There goes one of the six talking points. How come Clinton and Biden and sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #152

You sound upset, maybe you should have a little lie down. n/t Whisp Jul 2013 #157

Do I? Thanks for your concern, but I was of the opinion that you were pretty upset. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #164

hmm, that was pretty weak for a comeback. Whisp Jul 2013 #169

Was it? Well, you may be right but this isn't about ME. This is about the attacks on Journalists sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #175

Greenwald isn't a journalist, he's a Hack. Whisp Jul 2013 #180

A prominent news paper doesn't agree with you. But there you go again, focusing on sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #182

I am questioning his 'writing skills' Whisp Jul 2013 #183

To repeat your own question to me a few posts up, 'can't you use your own words sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #189

scandal scandal !! journalist expects to be paid so he can eat Swagman Jul 2013 #327

what a cheap and unproductive insult Swagman Jul 2013 #326

Glen clearly states he was wrong on some things- which doesn't automatically mean he is Swagman Jul 2013 #325

Anatomy of a Glenn Greenwald Smear Job (updated) Whisp Jul 2013 #154

Sabrina is going to send this whole thread to Glenn, per her threats upthread. Are you scared yet?nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #160

what? she going to sic The Glennie on us? Bring It. Whisp Jul 2013 #163

Post 147--you've got to read it for tone....nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #172

I think we need The Tattletale Portable Alarm System. Whisp Jul 2013 #178

OMFG.....we need an app for that on DU!!! It should go straight to Glen! Oh--and in other news, msanthrope Jul 2013 #186

I love this sub thread. Amazing to watch. I wouldn't bore GG with such childishness. But sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #240

Where's the cite that Glenn is suspended because he didn't pay fees? When you send this thread msanthrope Jul 2013 #241

Unfortunately for the smear campaign, the only one who can't find it is YOU! sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #244

If you've got the cite, why not just copy and paste it? Don't be coy! And when you send this off msanthrope Jul 2013 #246

If I cared I would do so. I'm much happier watching you embarrass yourself, over and over sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #249

Sabrina! If you've got a cite from the New York State Bar that says when a lawyer changes their msanthrope Jul 2013 #252

There you go again, spreading false information under the pretext of just innocently seeking sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #255

No--really!! You can resign or retire, rather than be suspended from the practice of law in NY-- msanthrope Jul 2013 #257

*yawn* ... good night partner in the fight against the smearing of and lying about sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #258

I hate it when you stomp out of the sandbox, Sabrina!! But don't forget to send this thread to GG!! msanthrope Jul 2013 #259

Lol! sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #312

all i can say is questionseverything Jul 2013 #330

GG stonecutter357 Jul 2013 #310

I'm waiting as patiently as I can. OilemFirchen Jul 2013 #289

Glenn Greenwald follows me on Twitter. I don't follow him. msanthrope Jul 2013 #296

More whining from an anonymous blogger. Seems to be jealous of Greenwalds work but sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #161

Doesn't everything and the Sun revolve around Greenwad? Whisp Jul 2013 #166

Yes, for some people the world does seem to revolve around Greenwald. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #171

You are focusing on 'writing skills' Whisp Jul 2013 #174

The content is about Obama and how he is being mistreated. I definitely did focus on the content. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #185

Are you calling Greenwald weak? Whisp Jul 2013 #188

GG is a journalist and no he does a very good job of defending himself. I am posting sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #190

Finding his own words, that he said Himself, is not a smear tactic. n/t Whisp Jul 2013 #191

Distorting his honest words is despicable. It is Rovian in its sheer reprehensibility. But it is a sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #193

Poor King Ratfucker Greenwald. Whisp Jul 2013 #194

I knew we would get to this. Thanks for obliging me. I was hoping it would happen sooner sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #197

The word applies to Greenwald: Whisp Jul 2013 #199

No, it doesn't. It does reek of desperation though, so carry on. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #219

The term 'ratfucking' is about 40 years old. To think it new indicates a lack of knowledge msanthrope Jul 2013 #214

I didn't say the 'word' was new, I said it was new to the anti journalist dialogue. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #217

That maybe could be explained away but.. great white snark Jul 2013 #245

You are quite welcome. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #248

No, actually, it was the 'lawyer' who didn't understand the standard procedure sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #266

GG's problem is that all six are verifiably true in so far as they're things based on his own words. Chan790 Jul 2013 #156

Explain what you mean. Your comment is just a reiteration of the smears with no context. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #181

Luckily, his detractors act like such raving assholes whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #179

And it is interesting how facts do not seem to matter either usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #201

See msanthrope's perfect demonstration of how smears and lies are born, right in this sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #256

Rec the OP & thanks also to Sabrina 1 Divernan Jul 2013 #268

Thank you. Blue_In_AK Jul 2013 #215

K&R to debunk all the Prosense and disinformation... n/t backscatter712 Jul 2013 #254

Thank You For Sharing cantbeserious Jul 2013 #260

This thread went through the looking glass so many times it needs its own BART train Fumesucker Jul 2013 #264

7. Pushed out of Salon.com for being a dick ... eom Kolesar Jul 2013 #265

Or took a better paying job at an Internationally read News Paper. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #281

This thread was very informative. Thanks Sabrina. myrna minx Jul 2013 #285

You're welcome, myrna. I did say it was public service OP, but could not have predicted how true sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #287

A million thanks, sabrina FredStembottom Jul 2013 #288

I had a feeling people would be following and I really did want to lead the way to complete exposure sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #293

So sorry to be responding so late..... FredStembottom Aug 2013 #341

Thanks, it was a very enlightening demonstration of how a smear sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #342

Just wanted to thank you for your thread which I just saw. It was locked I see, but I do appreciate sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #301

It was like watching a "Microsoft Office Smear Wizard" tutorial. myrna minx Jul 2013 #290

Lol, you hit the nail on the head! That has conjured up a hilarious image for me. Thanks again Myrna sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #294

That was an illuminating set of exchanges. Thank you! nt Pholus Jul 2013 #291

K&R marions ghost Jul 2013 #292

kr PufPuf23 Jul 2013 #295

So we can now quote GG that he admits he was "apathetic and passive" on THE most central grantcart Jul 2013 #297

Honesty is always an admirable trait, don't you agree?? He obvioulsy wanted people to sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #298

I agree grantcart Jul 2013 #305

Easy self-identification. Jakes Progress Jul 2013 #300

Way to go Sabrina! Maedhros Jul 2013 #304

Great OP and thread, sabrina 1. N.G.U. Octafish Jul 2013 #319

K & R just to piss off the Greenwald attackers dreamnightwind Jul 2013 #337