Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

11. Actually, it is a departure.

Reply to Bluenorthwest (Reply #8)

Mon Jul 29, 2013, 10:17 AM

Jul 2013

He didn't really say anything about not having sex ever. He says this:

“If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge him?”

Yes, it's not enough, but it actually is a departure. More of a departure than his comments on women in the priesthood.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pope says he won't judge gay priests [View all] cali Jul 2013 OP

Damn..I figured he was a different cut. He's laying the groundwork. Katashi_itto Jul 2013 #1

He did say homosexuality is a sin. mucifer Jul 2013 #2

Sounds like a call to beat confessions out of those sinners to me. He is calling us names. Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #10

Of course he won't... brooklynite Jul 2013 #3

No one is judging priests for their sexual orientation pokerfan Jul 2013 #4

Given that all priests are supposed to be celibate... jberryhill Jul 2013 #5

"Orientation" is not limited to who you have sex with. morningfog Jul 2013 #6

According to Fancis if we actually have sex this is a terrible thing, so the other poster has a Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #8

Actually, it is a departure. cali Jul 2013 #11

The sin in this case is if gay priests, who are sworn to celibacy have sex. bklyncowgirl Jul 2013 #17

The point is... jberryhill Jul 2013 #9

I understand your point now. morningfog Jul 2013 #15

Most of the time, even I don't understand my point jberryhill Jul 2013 #16

cali this is no differnt from what all the religious bigots say 'hate the sin, love the sinner' Bluenorthwest Jul 2013 #7

You think it's bad on GD theHandpuppet Jul 2013 #13

I disagree with some of the other posters. Beacool Jul 2013 #12

So, he's not going to burn them at the stake, but it's still a sin snooper2 Jul 2013 #14

I've got a feeling a John Paul I "incident" is in his near future. Apophis Jul 2013 #18