Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

William769

(59,147 posts)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:09 AM Jul 2013

Sheriff Claims He Didn't Know Anti-Sodomy Laws Weren't Valid Anymore [View all]

To understand the whole story, read this thread first, http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023361110


The U.S. Supreme Court invalidated anti-sodomy laws in 2003 but this sheriff says he didn't get the memo.

The East Baton Rouge sheriff who used Louisiana's defunct anti-sodomy law to arrest a dozen gay men since 2011 now says he didn't know the law was invalidated by the Supreme Court.

"To our knowledge, the Sheriff’s office was never contacted or told that the law was not enforceable or prosecutable," a statement from the Sheriff's Office claims. It was issued Sunday after The Advocate newspaper in Louisiana exposed the illegal undercover sting operation.

That explanation doesn't appear to satisfy Metro Councilman John Delgado.

“Does he know that slavery is no longer around?” an outraged Delgado told The Advocate newspaper in Louisiana. “Does he know that we have cars and no longer horse and buggies?”

The newspaper now reports that Delgado is demanding apologies be issued to the 12 men who were arrested, one as recent as this month.

As many judges will say and I'm sure you yourself have used "ignorance is no excuse for the law". You are either really fucking stupid or a liar, but I'll just assume your both.
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
really? it was in all the papers back then. but, I guess one would have to be literate. niyad Jul 2013 #1
since he doesn't know which laws he can legally enforce, he should resign CreekDog Jul 2013 #14
He was probably christian home "schooled" and as such never pays any attention to the news kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #16
He never wondered why the DA wouldn't prosecute? Shrike47 Jul 2013 #2
Ignorance of the law = law$uit$... n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #3
I hope so. William769 Jul 2013 #4
Ignorance of the law is... something... something... something. Xipe Totec Jul 2013 #5
What article did you get this from? Link it, it's new material. nt cecilfirefox Jul 2013 #6
It is linked in my OP. William769 Jul 2013 #8
Here: Dr. Strange Jul 2013 #17
The homophobe finds a pet project Sheepshank Jul 2013 #7
He's just saying that to cover his ass. NutmegYankee Jul 2013 #9
Except it doesn't cover his ass. jeff47 Jul 2013 #21
I long ago stopped believing the law applied equally to cops. nt NutmegYankee Jul 2013 #22
Obviously it doesn't. Cops get away with murder/manslaughter all the time. nomorenomore08 Jul 2013 #23
maybe his news carrier was sick that day Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #10
This sheriff will find out during the litigation process Gothmog Jul 2013 #11
Yep. William769 Jul 2013 #12
The sheriff had to back down Gothmog Jul 2013 #24
So not just the Sheriff, but all his deputies? Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #13
He's responsible for their actions Nevernose Jul 2013 #20
Now this sounds like a good case for a Civil Rights linvestigation Savannahmann Jul 2013 #15
Sure. That's a credible excuse. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #18
Why isn't he a "former" sheriff? Isn't this grounds for firing? Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sheriff Claims He Didn't ...