Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

tumtum

(438 posts)

16. That's not what he said.

Reply to Mr Dixon (Reply #14)

Mon Jul 29, 2013, 06:21 PM

Jul 2013

"He was throwing things through the window and terrorizing me, saying that I killed my baby and it should have been me," said Sherry West, the mother of the slain baby.

He seems to be saying that it should have been her killed instead of their son.

Oh, and that GSR?

West told Action News that she has an answer, "He may have touched my clothes in the hospital if there was GSR."

A conclusion from the state forensic report says, "This supports the possibility that (Santiago) discharged a firearm, was in close proximity to a firearm upon discharge, or came into contact with an item whose surface bears GSR."

And finally,

Neither Santiago nor West is a murder suspect, according to police. The murder trial is scheduled to begin next month.

http://www.actionnewsjax.com/content/topstories/story/Sherry-West-says-murdered-babys-father-went-nuts/faabQKMeIkiKfAddU9x7Tg.cspx

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sorry if this has been posted already......but some of us called this when the story broke [View all] Mr Dixon Jul 2013 OP

I find it hard to believe that you're actually believing this bullshit. tumtum Jul 2013 #1

SMH Mr Dixon Jul 2013 #3

The stalking is interesting. Nevernose Jul 2013 #4

There is no physical evidence that either parent had anything to do with the shooting. tumtum Jul 2013 #7

I don't know what to think of this case Just Saying Jul 2013 #6

It seems that the dad was angry that his son was killed instead of her. tumtum Jul 2013 #12

exactly. This is such horse shit from people that STILL can't admit they were wrong. alphafemale Jul 2013 #21

Sometimes it's exactly as it seems, tumtum Jul 2013 #22

gun shot residue is to be expected when you and your baby are shot. KittyWampus Jul 2013 #2

IMO Mr Dixon Jul 2013 #5

If they charge the parents with something, then I will Rex Jul 2013 #8

I didn't call it, I said I thought it was possible cali Jul 2013 #9

That is a true statement. randome Jul 2013 #10

agreed Mr Dixon Jul 2013 #11

People place waaay more credence in things like GSR tests than is warranted X_Digger Jul 2013 #13

Really? Mr Dixon Jul 2013 #14

Divorce court? Jerry Springer? X_Digger Jul 2013 #15

That's not what he said. tumtum Jul 2013 #16

where does it say she lied ? JI7 Jul 2013 #17

The only ones saying that she lied tumtum Jul 2013 #19

WOW Mr Dixon Jul 2013 #18

Who in authority is saying she lied? tumtum Jul 2013 #20

IMO Mr Dixon Jul 2013 #23

All these past cases have nothing to do with this case. tumtum Jul 2013 #24

SMH Mr Dixon Jul 2013 #25

Evidence is not an opinion Politicalboi Jul 2013 #27

Oh u get a gold star for calling it. geckosfeet Jul 2013 #26

It seems it is premature to Jenoch Jul 2013 #28

GSR on the mother isn't unusual. On the father, it could be a false positive. Kennah Jul 2013 #29

This website couldn't even get the details of the shooting right. tumtum Jul 2013 #30