Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snot

(11,846 posts)
10. K&R'd!
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 07:22 PM
Jul 2013

To clarify for anyone who might otherwise be misled: the FBI was aware that someone was planning sniper attacks against Occupy leadership; this is pursuant to internal FBI documents obtained through the FOIA.

The FBI did NOT warn any of the sniper targets that they were in danger.

The FBI knew who was planning the attacks, but their identity was blacked out in the documents.

The text quoted in the OP is somewhat garbled because the excerpt contained certain info in brackets; here it is again, with the brackets replaced with whatever you call those fancy parentheses things:

An identified {DELETED} as of October planned to engage in sniper attacks against protestors (sic) in Houston, Texas if deemed necessary. An identified {DELETED} had received intelligence that indicated the protesters in New York and Seattle planned similar protests in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and Austin, Texas. {DELETED} planned to gather intelligence against the leaders of the protest groups and obtain photographs, then formulate a plan to kill the leadership via suppressed sniper rifles. (Note: protests continued throughout the weekend with approximately 6000 persons in NYC. "Occupy Wall Street' protests have spread to about half of all states in the US, over a dozen European and Asian cities, including protests in Cleveland (10/6-8/11) at Willard Park which was initially attended by hundreds of protesters.)


Who could {DELETED} have been?

It was a person or agency not just politically opposed to Occupy but interested in receiving and gathering intelligence on the Occupiers and their plans. "Rifles" - plural - suggests there was a belief that more than one might be deployed, i.e. someone with colleagues or who could hire people.

The FBI knew who it was. How might the FBI have come to identify a person or agency planning to murder Occupiers -- had the FBI been worried about Occupiers' welfare and been busy doing preventive detective work just in case anyone might possibly wish to do them harm?

What became of DELETED -- were they arrested? Given the government's eagerness to display any plausible success in fighting "terrorists," you'd think we might have heard more about this.

Just sayin'.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So, peaceful protesters demanding change in the way the financial system is run, PDJane Jul 2013 #1
Have you heard of the Patriot Act? TBF Jul 2013 #13
:-) arely staircase Jul 2013 #2
So we should just shut up about it? East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #3
You could have mentioned that in the OP. randome Jul 2013 #22
If it'll make you feel better, East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #23
here is a scenario arely staircase Jul 2013 #32
psssst Zorra Jul 2013 #39
The Debate Club winner! randome Jul 2013 #43
That link is filled with some serious batshit crazy Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #4
I find that the idea of a sniper having cross hairs on me to be far worse... L0oniX Jul 2013 #5
they were there nebenaube Jul 2013 #24
Ah, the "proud" tradition of FBI snipers targeting unarmed civilians. Lizzie Poppet Jul 2013 #6
I can't tell from the article if it was them, or if they were tracking others doing that. (nt) Posteritatis Jul 2013 #9
Ain't That Something... KharmaTrain Jul 2013 #21
Definitely is a fascinatingly ambiguous bit of headline writing. (nt) Posteritatis Jul 2013 #25
Even if prevented, where are the prosecutions? Eddie Haskell Jul 2013 #33
maybe it turned out there was nothing to prevent nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #34
So the FBI prevented someone from attempting to kill protesters? randome Jul 2013 #7
They should have been informed. East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #8
K&R'd! snot Jul 2013 #10
great exposition. thank you! nashville_brook Jul 2013 #15
So somebody planned it. Igel Jul 2013 #11
So if the FBI learns that some goofball is talking about having a sniper kill you, snot Jul 2013 #12
If it's two yahoos who live 2000 miles away, probably no need to freak the occupy people out, nt geek tragedy Jul 2013 #36
If the FBI knows about threats by 2 yahoos 2000 mis. away, snot Jul 2013 #37
They can read Free Republic. nt geek tragedy Jul 2013 #38
I've seen snipers on roofs at lots of protests, from protesting Bush when he was in kas125 Jul 2013 #14
And we still don't know who conspired to murder these activists? Why is that? DirkGently Jul 2013 #16
The question I had when this first came to my attention.... socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 #17
maybe they looked into it and it was bullshit arely staircase Jul 2013 #19
Then let's have the FBI tell us who it was and their grounds for dismissing it. snot Jul 2013 #26
all sorts of conceivable and legitimate reasons for them not to do that arely staircase Jul 2013 #27
Well, when a guy threatened me by phone...... socialist_n_TN Jul 2013 #40
please see post 32 nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #42
^ Wilms Jul 2013 #18
This is what happens when you speak out against the criminal banksters. Enthusiast Jul 2013 #20
what happens? nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #28
If you are targeted the FBI will ignore it. Enthusiast Jul 2013 #29
no evidence of that nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #30
There is no evidence of a lot of things that people believe nonetheless. nt Enthusiast Jul 2013 #31
Carry a AK47 UglyGreed Jul 2013 #35
FBI ever get its story straight about that unarmed guy they shot 7 times? Octafish Jul 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FBI Files Show Snipers Ta...»Reply #10