Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,152 posts)
14. Well, let's go through it with a fine-toothed comb. Were there any military personnel present?
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 10:42 PM
Jul 2013

I have a whole series of questions, but let's handle them one at a time

Were there any military personnel present?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bradley Manning verdict? [View all] struggle4progress Jul 2013 OP
Acquittal. Time served. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #1
Care to back that up with something? n/t Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #24
No, just stating a preference. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #35
Are you asking should be or will be? antiquie Jul 2013 #2
I actually intended to ask what people expect to happen tomorrow. Sorry I wasn't clear struggle4progress Jul 2013 #4
I am not sure because arely staircase Jul 2013 #3
What do I want, or what do I think will happen? nt LWolf Jul 2013 #5
What do you think will happen? struggle4progress Jul 2013 #7
Guilty on some or all accounts. Prison. LWolf Jul 2013 #9
Remember folks this is a military court, not a civilian one.. Historic NY Jul 2013 #6
Exactly. Sentences are harsher, particularly if the court/jury believes the accused tarnished the stevenleser Jul 2013 #32
Courts martial board has been ordered to find him guilty by the Commander in Chief. Scuba Jul 2013 #8
Clueless TheLion Jul 2013 #10
My assertion is that the President's statement is influencing the Courts Martial board.... Scuba Jul 2013 #11
What military personnel were present when such statement was allegedly made? struggle4progress Jul 2013 #12
Every one with access to Youtube ... Scuba Jul 2013 #13
Well, let's go through it with a fine-toothed comb. Were there any military personnel present? struggle4progress Jul 2013 #14
Why would it matter? When Nixon ordered a world-wide alert in 1973 I didn't hear it from him. Scuba Jul 2013 #15
Presuming that answers my 1st question & your prior post answers my 2nd, I'll ask my 3rd struggle4progress Jul 2013 #16
Here is a more complete youtube of the conversation, if it helps your thinking regarding the matter struggle4progress Jul 2013 #17
I'm pretty sure it's not my thinking that needs the help. Scuba Jul 2013 #28
Then you'll provide a clean fact-based argument for unlawful command influence struggle4progress Jul 2013 #29
I did, and video proof that Obama declared Manning "broke the law". Scuba Jul 2013 #30
The prohibition on command influence is intended to ensure a fair trial, by preventing struggle4progress Jul 2013 #33
They will be "good soldiers" and find the whistle blower guilty. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #18
Doesn't count as whistleblowing... Pelican Jul 2013 #19
Tsk, tsk. Whistle blowers are required to follow "procedures"? Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #20
If they want whistleblower protection... Pelican Jul 2013 #21
I think the regime and NSA are a lot more worried about it than I am. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2013 #22
There's no "they": Manning elected for a trial by judge without jury struggle4progress Jul 2013 #23
They're going to name a new federal prison after him because he will Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #25
Word is that the judge has been offered a nice promotion when this is over, so Cleita Jul 2013 #26
... Schenck said Lind has already been informed that she will take up a new position, as a judge struggle4progress Jul 2013 #27
He's going to spend at least the next 40-60 years in prison. nt stevenleser Jul 2013 #31
I imagine guilty on something. MineralMan Jul 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bradley Manning verdict?»Reply #14