General Discussion

last1standing

(11,709 posts)

71. I like to think six impossible things before breakfast.

Reply to ProSense (Reply #70)

Tue Jul 30, 2013, 01:11 AM

Jul 2013

Thankfully I have your threads to read.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

158 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In 2005, Greenwald defended Tancredo against those calling him out for his racist views. [View all] ProSense Jul 2013 OP

Congrats! The Chamber of Commerce couldn't have said it better! last1standing Jul 2013 #1

Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #5

I've heard republicans call the left wing 'ratfuckers' but never a Democrat. last1standing Jul 2013 #14

In 2006, ProSense was against NSA spying LondonReign2 Jul 2013 #136

Bush WAS spying illegally, Congress institutionalized the program in 2006. You're upset that blm Jul 2013 #153

That's what you got out of the post? LondonReign2 Jul 2013 #155

If I misunderstood then I apologize. blm Jul 2013 #158

Tom Tancredo works for the Chamber of Commerce. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #142

Many people work for the Chamber of Commerce in different capacities. last1standing Jul 2013 #150

A really big YAWN & a special thanks from Booz Allen think Jul 2013 #2

It's not called killing the messenger ... it's frazzled Jul 2013 #21

If Snowden tortured as a spy we wouldn't be having this conversation think Jul 2013 #25

Huh? frazzled Jul 2013 #27

It was a reference to Robert Lady.... think Jul 2013 #40

No, it IS killing the messenger. Really it is. Every day, all hours of the day. nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #62

If Greenwald defended Tom fucking Tancredo, I'd say that's GREAT cause for concern. Arkana Jul 2013 #132

If the fucking NSA broke fucking laws is that not important? think Jul 2013 #137

Didn't say it wasn't. Arkana Jul 2013 #146

If George Bush came forward with facts of war crimes against Cheney think Jul 2013 #148

No, but I'd wonder what Bush's motives were since I don't trust him given his past. Arkana Jul 2013 #149

This Greenwald sounds like a bad dude leftstreet Jul 2013 #3

Oh FFS! LAGC Jul 2013 #4

It's not like I'm a Democratic politician, say Biden or Clinton, who has to watch what I say. ProSense Jul 2013 #7

And then proceed to smear the ones who say what you don't want to hear. cui bono Jul 2013 #17

It is something of a puzzle for us in Colorado Robb Jul 2013 #6

Coors. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #9

Coors leftstreet Jul 2013 #10

Coors. Autumn Jul 2013 #11

Coors beer or Tom Tancredo: ProSense Jul 2013 #15

OMG you never show your sense of humour! leftstreet Jul 2013 #18

. ProSense Jul 2013 #24

Oliver Willis had Glenn pegged from the start. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #8

Nicely catapulted propaganda! Agony Jul 2013 #12

No, Greenwald's past comments with a brief statement by me. ProSense Jul 2013 #19

Character assasination AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #103

Glenn's "deeply held beliefs" appear to emanate from his right rear pants ucrdem Jul 2013 #13

The Chamber of Commerce agrees with you. last1standing Jul 2013 #20

And Romney and most Republicans agree with Greenwald's views on immigrants. DevonRex Jul 2013 #51

They agree with what he used to believe, while you are still using their tactics. last1standing Jul 2013 #55

LOL. Don't lecture me on tactics. DevonRex Jul 2013 #72

You started the lectures, I merely responded. last1standing Jul 2013 #74

And what exactly does this have to do with whether GG is right or wrong about the NSA? NuclearDem Jul 2013 #16

It has everything to do with my opinion of Greenwald. Is that OK? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #22

If you didn't have a history of digging up dirt on Snowden and Greenwald, I might believe that. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #28

You don't "believe" it has anything to with my opinion of Greenwald? ProSense Jul 2013 #33

Hypocrisy by who? When have I ever done that? NuclearDem Jul 2013 #37

Who accused you of doing that? ProSense Jul 2013 #44

That's not what hypocrisy means. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #58

Hypocrisy ProSense Jul 2013 #92

Here, do us all a favor and look up what hypocrisy means. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #96

"What you just described is called a superiority complex. " ProSense Jul 2013 #99

Oh for the love of Christ NuclearDem Jul 2013 #102

Add ProSense Jul 2013 #106

The "you" was not referring to you specifically. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #111

That's why I said "someone," and thanks for acknowledging that you made the point. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #120

Yeah, I think we're done here. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #122

Have you considered that Republicans are obstructionists and Obama doesn't control congress? cui bono Jul 2013 #32

A good point, unfortunately one that had absolutely nothing to do with what I said. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #34

I didn't think the sarcasm tag was necessary there. :) cui bono Jul 2013 #41

Oh good God I'm embarrassed now. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #43

Don't feel too bad. Unfortunately these days it really is hard to tell what is sarcasm cui bono Jul 2013 #46

This has become so tiresome. Marr Jul 2013 #23

See ProSense Jul 2013 #26

I'm starting to think that protecting Obama has little to do with these threads. last1standing Jul 2013 #29

I tend to agree. Marr Jul 2013 #31

Well, ProSense Jul 2013 #35

I'm sure the contractors for the NSA agree with you. last1standing Jul 2013 #38

Don't know, don't care. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #39

Lol! You post a helluva lot for someone who doesn't care. last1standing Jul 2013 #42

LOL! I don't know, don't care who you claim agrees with me. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #45

Yet you keep responding. last1standing Jul 2013 #47

Well, it's one way to keep the thread kicked n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #48

Believe me, there's nothing I'd like better than to keep this thread kicked. last1standing Jul 2013 #49

Thanks n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #56

Glad to to help you show people who you really are. last1standing Jul 2013 #59

Also exposes Greenwald defense of a racist and his appalling views on "illegal immigration." n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #61

And the fact that your post is exactly what the Chamber of Commerce wants to see. last1standing Jul 2013 #63

I don't care what you think the CoC wants. ProSense Jul 2013 #65

And you won't change anyone's opinion with contextless smear tactics. last1standing Jul 2013 #66

Oh, there's context, and I'll continue posting my opinions. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #68

I know you'll keep posting opinions. last1standing Jul 2013 #69

Yup, I'll keep posting my opinons, and you'll keep pondering the ridiculous. ProSense Jul 2013 #70

I like to think six impossible things before breakfast. last1standing Jul 2013 #71

"Thankfully I have your threads to read." Glad to be of service. ProSense Jul 2013 #76

I don't think it's me you serve. last1standing Jul 2013 #78

You seem really stuck on the "Chamber of Commerce." Are you a member? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #79

It's your "opinions" that always seem to line up with theirs, not mine. last1standing Jul 2013 #80

You're the one insisting you know their opinions. I have no idea, and don't care, n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #82

No offense, but that's the silliest argument I've heard in ages. last1standing Jul 2013 #85

No, you keep telling me about the CoC's opinions. I assume you know what you're talking about. ProSense Jul 2013 #86

Yes, I do know what I'm talking about. It's called being informed of the issues. last1standing Jul 2013 #87

You're probably really knowledgeable about free speech and opinions too, right? ProSense Jul 2013 #89

Again yes. last1standing Jul 2013 #127

Cool, so you'll allow me my opinion? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #128

I'll not only allow the opinions you express, I'll kick them for you. last1standing Jul 2013 #152

Seriously? I'm trying to avoid taking sides, but you guys are seeing informants in your soup. Arkana Jul 2013 #134

At this point Prosense and I are just needling each other for fun. last1standing Jul 2013 #151

the Obama administration is doing a fine job of making itself look bad lately grasswire Jul 2013 #84

Awww, you poor little thing... RetroLounge Jul 2013 #30

How cute. ProSense Jul 2013 #36

The more I read about Greenwald, the more I really think he's nothing more than a racist Republican Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #50

So you linked to Greenwald when he posted conservative crap but don't now that he doesn't? last1standing Jul 2013 #53

No...I linked to his drone stories. Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #54

Maybe you should read his intro to that column where he talks about his changing beliefs. last1standing Jul 2013 #57

I'm sorry, but I just can't find it in me to even take this guy seriously any more. Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #60

You know, I can actually understand that. last1standing Jul 2013 #64

I stopped Jamaal510 Jul 2013 #67

I never supported him, just a few thing I agreed with Rex Jul 2013 #156

And the NSA still spies on us AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #52

Kind of sad watching you self destruct whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #73

Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #75

Welcome to DU. ProSense Jul 2013 #77

ProSense mode number 3. Savannahmann Jul 2013 #81

Oooh, bizarre. ProSense Jul 2013 #83

How do you keep being wrong and missing the point of everything post after post, Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #88

Because you disagree with me? ProSense Jul 2013 #90

How on Earth did you get that idea from his post? NuclearDem Jul 2013 #91

Do you think Tancredo is a racist? Do you agree with Greenwald on "illegal" immigration? ProSense Jul 2013 #94

Why are you asserting I don't like the OP because it's critical of Greenwald? NuclearDem Jul 2013 #98

Because ProSense Jul 2013 #100

Logical fallacy bingo! NuclearDem Jul 2013 #105

LOL! ProSense Jul 2013 #108

Well, let's see! In this thread, we have from you: NuclearDem Jul 2013 #116

My list, you in this thread: pure deflection. ProSense Jul 2013 #118

Greenwald says he no longer holds those views on immigration. Hissyspit Jul 2013 #125

Greenwald says he never supported the Iraq war. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #129

More exclusion and misrepresentation. Hissyspit Jul 2013 #154

Nope. I have no opinion on 90% of the crap you post since most of what you write Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #97

Wow ProSense Jul 2013 #101

Therefore NSA spying on US citizens is a great idea! eridani Jul 2013 #93

"Exemplary logic, that." It's your logic. ProSense Jul 2013 #95

OP states "It's all about the messenger, not the message" n/t eridani Jul 2013 #104

No, OP state: Greenwald defended Tancredo. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #109

And we should care about that because why? eridani Jul 2013 #124

Who said you had to "care"? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #131

It's called 'deflection' AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #107

That's hilarious, ProSense Jul 2013 #110

Well, when you make threads when you constantly link to yourself NuclearDem Jul 2013 #112

LOL! At least you admit it, even though you're attempting to blame me for your off-topic comments. ProSense Jul 2013 #114

My mother taught me in the first grade AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #113

Why ProSense Jul 2013 #117

Because AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #121

Are you old enough now to realize that ProSense Jul 2013 #133

I'm old enough to realize AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #147

.... DeSwiss Jul 2013 #115

What the hell is that? ProSense Jul 2013 #119

NSA spying is wrong. The Obama admin is wrong on the issue... ram2008 Jul 2013 #123

K & R Scurrilous Jul 2013 #126

DU rec...nt SidDithers Jul 2013 #130

DUers have been had by the forked-tongue opportunist Greenwald. nt BumRushDaShow Jul 2013 #135

Libertarians talk out of UglyGreed Jul 2013 #138

... Scurrilous Jul 2013 #139

Do you work? WilliamPitt Jul 2013 #140

You already PM'd me accusing me of being a paid shill ProSense Jul 2013 #143

So that's a "no." WilliamPitt Jul 2013 #145

K & R! I must have missed this post from yesterday. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #141

OMG AT THIS PARAGRAPH: JaneyVee Jul 2013 #144

He has since recanted those views. nt Hissyspit Jul 2013 #157