Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(126,157 posts)
25. Do the arithmetic. Divide the number of documents Manning released by the total time he was in Iraq.
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 02:12 AM
Jul 2013

It comes out to about two documents per minute

That is, if Manning read documents 24/7, without any time allotted for eating or sleeping or showering or actually doing his job or anything else, maybe he could have read all 700K+ documents in that time, if he read a document every 30 seconds

It's not physically possible for him even to have known what exactly he was releasing, let alone for him to have had an informed opinion about his releases, and even less possible for him to have gone through more documents than he released and carefully chosen the ones he actually released because he was convinced that those documents really showed some criminality that needed to be exposed

The only possible conclusion is that he simply dumped data, without any clear idea what he was dumping, possibly for purely ideological reasons, possibly because he was confused or depressed or angry, possibly because he wanted to impress somebody: I don't know what

Claiming this has something to do with journalism is risible. It's like a guy backing a truck up to a newspaper office and unloading 1400 reams of paper documents with the comment that maybe there's a story somewhere in there: if you set crack reporters reading the paper stack, at 2 minutes a page, 40 hours a week, 50 weeks a year, it's going to take several years to get through it all. Nobody does journalism that way, on the off-chance maybe you'll find something in the stack

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes. It is scary. PDJane Jul 2013 #1
+1 and a K&R nt AnotherDreamWeaver Jul 2013 #2
I'm sure he will go on Foxnews to explain how the people Rex Jul 2013 #3
In what way is "nobody" talking about the Manning trial? brooklynite Jul 2013 #4
fer cryzake, this trial isn't getting time in the MSM. delrem Jul 2013 #23
I don't know. I heard the verdict on CBS Radio news. MineralMan Jul 2013 #41
yes, the verdict is getting some air time. delrem Jul 2013 #47
you do realize that the title of the thread comes directly from the article, don't you? magical thyme Jul 2013 #33
That implies.... Pelican Jul 2013 #5
That depends whether the government is abusing its secrecy powers. limpyhobbler Jul 2013 #10
I sympathize with your dilemma. It would be so nice if everyone just let Big Daddy government rhett o rick Jul 2013 #15
I'll look back later ... Pelican Jul 2013 #18
++++1000 nt kelliekat44 Jul 2013 #26
I have known for a while I am an enemy of the State nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #6
Manning is not a journalist. He is a soldier who had a special responsibility pnwmom Jul 2013 #7
Your lack of compassion and empathy is scary. Are you "politically liberal"????? nm rhett o rick Jul 2013 #14
According to a lot of people delrem Jul 2013 #24
because no true liberal could disagree with you, right arely staircase Jul 2013 #36
That's not actually what no true scotsman means. JoeyT Jul 2013 #38
and my assertion you are engaging in that fallacy is valid arely staircase Jul 2013 #40
also sorry arely staircase Jul 2013 #43
It has nothing to do with me. I someone disagrees with the left on everything then rhett o rick Jul 2013 #39
i dont agree with the premise arely staircase Jul 2013 #42
When our government is operating in secrecy to keep us from knowing rhett o rick Jul 2013 #44
Ya, cuz going through the "established channels" is safe and effective. Hydra Jul 2013 #17
The outcome of this trial could set a precedent in what is considered journalism. icymist Jul 2013 #8
It's like poker: if you have to ask who The Enemy is kenny blankenship Jul 2013 #16
How is Manning a journalist? FSogol Jul 2013 #37
He & Snowden are modern day Paul Revere's with a thumb drive full of news that Tyranny is coming! usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jul 2013 #9
you betcha arely staircase Jul 2013 #13
This is what I don't like about our adversarial court system. One side usually engages in lying. reformist2 Jul 2013 #11
the enemy he referrenced wasn't journalists arely staircase Jul 2013 #12
There's no question about OBL Hydra Jul 2013 #20
problem with the exposing crimes argument arely staircase Jul 2013 #21
Latest evidence says no Hydra Jul 2013 #22
Maybe there was a reason that they didn't report on it... Pelican Jul 2013 #31
Legal and ethical? Hydra Jul 2013 #32
Read the 15-6 investigation... Pelican Jul 2013 #34
in snowdens case arely staircase Jul 2013 #35
Journalists ARE the hands of the enemy. OnyxCollie Jul 2013 #19
Do the arithmetic. Divide the number of documents Manning released by the total time he was in Iraq. struggle4progress Jul 2013 #25
this for me shows blatant disregard for the info he qas entrusted with loli phabay Jul 2013 #30
K&R Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 #27
K&R..........nt Enthusiast Jul 2013 #28
Rec Kick..... n/t Smarmie Doofus Jul 2013 #29
Pfc Manning exposed WAR CRIMES. bvar22 Jul 2013 #45
This is a pattern that is happening everywhere now where the messenger is punished INSTEAD... cascadiance Jul 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Scariest Quote You'll...»Reply #25