Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ralph "Thanks for 2000" Nader:Hillary Clinton needs challenger from the left [View all]Xipe Totec
(44,558 posts)13. Really? nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ralph "Thanks for 2000" Nader:Hillary Clinton needs challenger from the left [View all]
Freddie Stubbs
Jul 2013
OP
Nader has accomplished more to destroy progressive causes than anyone I can name
Coyotl
Jul 2013
#47
+1000.....Everything positive he accomplished has long been overwhelmed by the evil he has allowed
Rowdyboy
Jul 2013
#63
He'll get no quarter here...I'll despise his raunchy ass until he draws his final useless breath.
Rowdyboy
Jul 2013
#97
IMO, primaries should provide choice among ideas and people, so of course,
HereSince1628
Jul 2013
#2
D*mn right, I was NEVER a Bill Clinton voter....why would I EVER vote for Hillary.....
a kennedy
Jul 2013
#27
Yeah, if Nader ever did anything good, that more than tarnished it. No diff between Bush and Gore
stevenleser
Jul 2013
#10
SCOTUS wouldn't have been able to do it without Nader drawing so many votes away in FLA
Hekate
Jul 2013
#92
I blame Gore for 2000. He violated the first precept of American politics which is that
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#109
At the time, it was a relatively unknown GW Bush vs. Gore and his sidekick, Lieberman.
Marr
Jul 2013
#103
"Twelve percent of Florida Democrats (over 200,000) voted for Republican George Bush"
klook
Jul 2013
#11
Which might matter if one could control how everyone registered. You can register GOP if you want
stevenleser
Jul 2013
#16
My point is, continuing to focus on Nader as the sole reason we lost the 2000 election is inaccurate
klook
Jul 2013
#28
My point is that Nader deserves some of the blame and the exculpatory reasoning you provided doesnt
stevenleser
Jul 2013
#39
he's not the sole reason, obviously (ie SCOTUS), but to say he wasn't a factor is silly.
dionysus
Jul 2013
#52
If Nader committed a 'crime against humanity,' then why did Gore concede? No one
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#45
Oh, puh-leeze. Without Hillary's and Kerry's assent (and the assent of many other prominent Dems),
HardTimes99
Jul 2013
#102
Not that he's necessarily wrong here, but why does Nader never attack the Republicans this same way?
WinkyDink
Jul 2013
#18
Ah, so it's only perceived hypocrisy, not policies, he is against. Okay, then.
WinkyDink
Jul 2013
#55
If I had reservations about Hillary, and I do, Nader's opposition to her only increases the.....
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#81