Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)A Little Basic Math: The Trillions We Waste in 'Defending' the US [View all]
http://www.nationofchange.org/little-basic-math-trillions-we-waste-defending-us-1375107669
Just a few weeks ago, the U.S. Defense Secretary, Robert Gates argued against president Obamas aim to cut $400 billion from national security spending, a bloated habit which was to be reigned in over the next 12 years, but lets look at what the U.S. government has spent on defending our nation in just the last decade.
Getting Rid of Fossil Fuel Dependency
We have transferred over $4 trillion of energy-wealth to foreign countries in the past decade in the form of petroleum dependency, and this speaks nothing of the cost of controlling the Middle Eastern countries who largely supply the U.S. with its cocaine-like dependency on fossil fuels.
The cost of securing forces to travel and fight in the Middle East is astounding. According to costofwar.com, tax payers have shelled out more than $814,809,683,000 to fight in Iraq, and more than $645,114,590,000 in Afghanistan. The cost of fighting in the Persian Gulf, is estimated to have cost over $50 billion a year. In a decade, that adds up to $500 billion. If we were to look at this one line item alone, we could install a solar system in every single home in America (approximately 313,915,000 people live in America and presumably not all in individual households), at an average of 86 cents per kilowatt, and with solar cell technology advancing every day, the entire nation could be running off the power of the sun in less than a decade.
Congress recently reviewed an appeal to cut more than $3 billion to fund an alternate engine for a Joint Strike Fighter, which members of the Navy, Air Force, and Marines have called unnecessary. Might not $3 billion provide free solar power to some of our nations poorest, not unlike the recent initiative being carried out in Peru, which will provide solar energy to over two million citizens? Or why not give just half of that money to researchers, Vladimir Bulovic and Richard Lunt from MIT who developed a transparent solar cell that can be applied to windows and even paint? Id pick up a paintbrush tomorrow, if it meant we could stop supporting the petro-dollar, wouldnt you?
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The US military is all about defending CORPORATE INTERESTS,. not the people of America!!!
Civilization2
Jul 2013
#1
And yet they still line up to support them financially in the hopes of getting a little back.
raouldukelives
Jul 2013
#18
Aye, tried and failed. If you can't beat them, join them is the refrain. nt
raouldukelives
Jul 2013
#29
and the working poor (and unemployed poor!),. i.e. non-stockholders, get the trickle down?
Civilization2
Jul 2013
#28
But where will the wealthy steal their money if they can't steal from the Treasury? nt
valerief
Jul 2013
#4
The real purpose of the Defense Dept. is to transfer wealth to the few from the many.
Coyotl
Jul 2013
#8
"The real purpose of the Defense Dept. is to transfer wealth to the few from the many."
Civilization2
Jul 2013
#30
LOL! You didn't answer the question. Who is it that has these metaphorical swords that
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2013
#36
"Anyone" is not an answer. It is a very serious question and one which none of you
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2013
#40