Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
32. It's not as radical
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 08:44 AM
Jul 2013
Obama wants to cut the corporate tax rate of 35 percent down to 28 percent and give manufacturers a preferred rate of 25 percent. He also wants a minimum tax on foreign earnings as a tool against corporate tax evasion and increased use of tax havens.

The new twist is that in exchange for his support for a corporate tax reduction, he wants money generated by the tax overhaul to be used on a mix of proposals such as funding infrastructure projects like repairing roads and bridges, improving education at community colleges, and promoting manufacturing, senior administration officials said.

<...>

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/30/us-usa-obama-idUSBRE96T0F820130730#undefined

...as other proposals. I'd like to see the details. The problem is that most large corporations pay little to no taxes because of the gigantic loopholes. The rate can't be lowered if the loopholes aren't eliminated.

Wyden has been pushing a plan to lower it to 24 percent.

Ron Wyden is wonkish, optimistic, idiosyncratic — and about to be very powerful

By Ezra Klein

Sen. Max Baucus’s (D-Mont.) announcement that he’ll retire in 2014 clears the way for Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) to become chairman of the powerful Senate Finance Committee. If Baucus annoyed Democrats for being too cautious, Wyden will annoy them by being too ambitious — and too ceaselessly interested in brokering big, bipartisan deals.

<...>

But Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, has a plan. Originally, it was co-sponsored by Judd Gregg, a Republican senator from New Hampshire. But he retired in 2010. Now it’s co-sponsored by Dan Coats, a Republican senator from Indiana. The plan wipes out a raft of deductions and exemptions; lowers rates for individuals and corporations; eliminates the alternative minimum tax; makes filing easier and, for many Americans, automatic; and is roughly revenue neutral with the expiration of the Bush tax cuts for households with income more than $250,000. It’s not as radical as some other ideas out there, but then, neither is the political system. I would bet that Wyden’s plan ends up pretty close to what we eventually get.

- more -

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/04/23/ron-wyden-is-wonkish-optimistic-idiosyncratic-and-about-to-be-very-powerful/


Wyden-Coats would grant large corporations a onetime repatriation tax holiday, letting them bring that money into the United States at a rock-bottom tax rate. By eliminating deferral, Wyden said, his bill would sharply reduce the corporate tax rate to 24 percent from 35 percent.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/21/us-usa-tax-wyden-idUSTRE78K1YB20110921


Tax code can be made less taxing

By SEN. RON WYDEN

President Barack Obama has challenged Congress to do something it hasn’t done in 25 years: reform the federal tax code.

It’s no small thing.

The tax code is filled with hundreds of tax breaks and loopholes, each fought for and backed by special-interest groups determined to keep them. Given the recent, highly partisan tax debates, it is hard to imagine Democrats and Republicans coming together to write one bill. But I share the president’s optimism that it can be done.

First, it has been done before. In 1986, a Democratic House majority joined forces with President Ronald Reagan and a Republican-led Senate to overhaul the federal tax code. There was no precedent for that coalition, but there is one today.

Joining forces against special interests, Democrats and Republicans sent the president sweeping bipartisan legislation that eliminated numerous tax breaks and loopholes to streamline the code and hold down rates for everyone, without any additional government spending.

more

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48943.html


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

and he trusts the Republicans to keep their theaocp Jul 2013 #1
Robbing Peter to pay Paul Ichingcarpenter Jul 2013 #2
Lowering corporate tax rates again? TBF Jul 2013 #3
He is negotiating with himself nt Teamster Jeff Jul 2013 #4
Finally, Obama is seeing the light on corporate tax rates badtoworse Jul 2013 #5
Please provide evidence to back your claims. There's a lot published that says you're wrong. Scuba Jul 2013 #6
See link below. badtoworse Jul 2013 #7
See Buns of Fire's post below. Scuba Jul 2013 #12
See my response badtoworse Jul 2013 #15
Nonsense. Corp tax rates the lowest in decades. n/t ms liberty Jul 2013 #8
I agree Duckhunter935 Jul 2013 #9
There's a difference, though, between the statutory rate and the effective rate: Buns_of_Fire Jul 2013 #10
So other countries don't have tax deductions as well? badtoworse Jul 2013 #14
I don't know why you are trying to John2 Jul 2013 #22
I remember McCain and other Republicans touting Ireland's low corporate tax rate. W_HAMILTON Jul 2013 #24
The people paying John2 Jul 2013 #31
What an erudite response. badtoworse Jul 2013 #27
No, it is John2 Jul 2013 #36
Are you serious? badtoworse Jul 2013 #38
Teh Stupid, It Burns.... Jeff In Milwaukee Jul 2013 #26
By continent 2011..lower labor costs..2$ per day .and NO regulations at ALL angstlessk Jul 2013 #45
No. Companies want to pay slave wages, and can do so in Thailand, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Mexico, ...... WinkyDink Jul 2013 #19
You're right. What other explanation could there be? badtoworse Jul 2013 #21
None that you'll posit. WinkyDink Jul 2013 #44
Corporate tax rates are too damn high! Capt. Obvious Jul 2013 #23
Corporate taxes have fallen from 26% of Federal revenues to 10% LondonReign2 Jul 2013 #29
Cut corporate tax rates? Another Republican proposal from a self-described Broward Jul 2013 #11
Exactly, and John2 Jul 2013 #25
Not until we get a decent Congress. The current Congress could not wipe it's butt correctly. nt bemildred Jul 2013 #13
But they are so good at licking them, ChairmanAgnostic Jul 2013 #16
How about reducing CIA travel money to 3 stars instead of 5 stars? Pholus Jul 2013 #17
"Job creation PROPOSALS"? Oh, now THERE'S something with real teeth! Bwahahahaha! WinkyDink Jul 2013 #18
Sounds like classic "Popeye/Wimpy" strategy to me - the Pukes bullwinkle428 Jul 2013 #20
Newsflash: Obama (R) is going to screw over the people who voted for him again. PowerToThePeople Jul 2013 #28
Keep in mind mick063 Jul 2013 #30
It's not as radical ProSense Jul 2013 #32
Wonder if Wyden will get thrown under the bus for those. JoePhilly Jul 2013 #35
"I'd like to see the details." Translation: I haven't got my talking points yet. DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #40
Am I the only one here who thinks the phrase "New Deal", as used in that headline.... beerandjesus Jul 2013 #33
Because it's worked so well before. gtar100 Jul 2013 #34
Sold Out yet again FreakinDJ Jul 2013 #37
More permanent corporate rule in exchange for another temporary gesture. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #39
Yes indeedy! Safetykitten Jul 2013 #41
Yessir BrotherIvan Jul 2013 #42
Investors get what they pay for. nt raouldukelives Jul 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama to Offer New Deal o...»Reply #32