Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
138. Libertarians talk out of
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 10:46 AM
Jul 2013

both sides of their face to attract as many sheeple as possible. God forbid you should state facts that go against any their demigods, you will be labeled as COINTELPRO and working for the government. The way they flood websites reminds me of the SA drowning out the opposition at the beer halls of Germany. Just turn off the sound and watch Alex Jones rant, who does he remind you of??? We have been spied on by our government and by their allies for decades this is nothing new.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Congrats! The Chamber of Commerce couldn't have said it better! last1standing Jul 2013 #1
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #5
I've heard republicans call the left wing 'ratfuckers' but never a Democrat. last1standing Jul 2013 #14
In 2006, ProSense was against NSA spying LondonReign2 Jul 2013 #136
Bush WAS spying illegally, Congress institutionalized the program in 2006. You're upset that blm Jul 2013 #153
That's what you got out of the post? LondonReign2 Jul 2013 #155
If I misunderstood then I apologize. blm Jul 2013 #158
Tom Tancredo works for the Chamber of Commerce. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #142
Many people work for the Chamber of Commerce in different capacities. last1standing Jul 2013 #150
A really big YAWN & a special thanks from Booz Allen think Jul 2013 #2
It's not called killing the messenger ... it's frazzled Jul 2013 #21
If Snowden tortured as a spy we wouldn't be having this conversation think Jul 2013 #25
Huh? frazzled Jul 2013 #27
It was a reference to Robert Lady.... think Jul 2013 #40
No, it IS killing the messenger. Really it is. Every day, all hours of the day. nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #62
If Greenwald defended Tom fucking Tancredo, I'd say that's GREAT cause for concern. Arkana Jul 2013 #132
If the fucking NSA broke fucking laws is that not important? think Jul 2013 #137
Didn't say it wasn't. Arkana Jul 2013 #146
If George Bush came forward with facts of war crimes against Cheney think Jul 2013 #148
No, but I'd wonder what Bush's motives were since I don't trust him given his past. Arkana Jul 2013 #149
This Greenwald sounds like a bad dude leftstreet Jul 2013 #3
Oh FFS! LAGC Jul 2013 #4
It's not like I'm a Democratic politician, say Biden or Clinton, who has to watch what I say. ProSense Jul 2013 #7
And then proceed to smear the ones who say what you don't want to hear. cui bono Jul 2013 #17
It is something of a puzzle for us in Colorado Robb Jul 2013 #6
Coors. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #9
Coors leftstreet Jul 2013 #10
Coors. Autumn Jul 2013 #11
Coors beer or Tom Tancredo: ProSense Jul 2013 #15
OMG you never show your sense of humour! leftstreet Jul 2013 #18
. ProSense Jul 2013 #24
Oliver Willis had Glenn pegged from the start. nt msanthrope Jul 2013 #8
Nicely catapulted propaganda! Agony Jul 2013 #12
No, Greenwald's past comments with a brief statement by me. ProSense Jul 2013 #19
Character assasination AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #103
Glenn's "deeply held beliefs" appear to emanate from his right rear pants ucrdem Jul 2013 #13
The Chamber of Commerce agrees with you. last1standing Jul 2013 #20
And Romney and most Republicans agree with Greenwald's views on immigrants. DevonRex Jul 2013 #51
They agree with what he used to believe, while you are still using their tactics. last1standing Jul 2013 #55
LOL. Don't lecture me on tactics. DevonRex Jul 2013 #72
You started the lectures, I merely responded. last1standing Jul 2013 #74
And what exactly does this have to do with whether GG is right or wrong about the NSA? NuclearDem Jul 2013 #16
It has everything to do with my opinion of Greenwald. Is that OK? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #22
If you didn't have a history of digging up dirt on Snowden and Greenwald, I might believe that. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #28
You don't "believe" it has anything to with my opinion of Greenwald? ProSense Jul 2013 #33
Hypocrisy by who? When have I ever done that? NuclearDem Jul 2013 #37
Who accused you of doing that? ProSense Jul 2013 #44
That's not what hypocrisy means. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #58
Hypocrisy ProSense Jul 2013 #92
Here, do us all a favor and look up what hypocrisy means. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #96
"What you just described is called a superiority complex. " ProSense Jul 2013 #99
Oh for the love of Christ NuclearDem Jul 2013 #102
Add ProSense Jul 2013 #106
The "you" was not referring to you specifically. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #111
That's why I said "someone," and thanks for acknowledging that you made the point. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #120
Yeah, I think we're done here. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #122
Have you considered that Republicans are obstructionists and Obama doesn't control congress? cui bono Jul 2013 #32
A good point, unfortunately one that had absolutely nothing to do with what I said. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #34
I didn't think the sarcasm tag was necessary there. :) cui bono Jul 2013 #41
Oh good God I'm embarrassed now. NuclearDem Jul 2013 #43
Don't feel too bad. Unfortunately these days it really is hard to tell what is sarcasm cui bono Jul 2013 #46
This has become so tiresome. Marr Jul 2013 #23
See ProSense Jul 2013 #26
I'm starting to think that protecting Obama has little to do with these threads. last1standing Jul 2013 #29
I tend to agree. Marr Jul 2013 #31
Well, ProSense Jul 2013 #35
I'm sure the contractors for the NSA agree with you. last1standing Jul 2013 #38
Don't know, don't care. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #39
Lol! You post a helluva lot for someone who doesn't care. last1standing Jul 2013 #42
LOL! I don't know, don't care who you claim agrees with me. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #45
Yet you keep responding. last1standing Jul 2013 #47
Well, it's one way to keep the thread kicked n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #48
Believe me, there's nothing I'd like better than to keep this thread kicked. last1standing Jul 2013 #49
Thanks n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #56
Glad to to help you show people who you really are. last1standing Jul 2013 #59
Also exposes Greenwald defense of a racist and his appalling views on "illegal immigration." n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #61
And the fact that your post is exactly what the Chamber of Commerce wants to see. last1standing Jul 2013 #63
I don't care what you think the CoC wants. ProSense Jul 2013 #65
And you won't change anyone's opinion with contextless smear tactics. last1standing Jul 2013 #66
Oh, there's context, and I'll continue posting my opinions. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #68
I know you'll keep posting opinions. last1standing Jul 2013 #69
Yup, I'll keep posting my opinons, and you'll keep pondering the ridiculous. ProSense Jul 2013 #70
I like to think six impossible things before breakfast. last1standing Jul 2013 #71
"Thankfully I have your threads to read." Glad to be of service. ProSense Jul 2013 #76
I don't think it's me you serve. last1standing Jul 2013 #78
You seem really stuck on the "Chamber of Commerce." Are you a member? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #79
It's your "opinions" that always seem to line up with theirs, not mine. last1standing Jul 2013 #80
You're the one insisting you know their opinions. I have no idea, and don't care, n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #82
No offense, but that's the silliest argument I've heard in ages. last1standing Jul 2013 #85
No, you keep telling me about the CoC's opinions. I assume you know what you're talking about. ProSense Jul 2013 #86
Yes, I do know what I'm talking about. It's called being informed of the issues. last1standing Jul 2013 #87
You're probably really knowledgeable about free speech and opinions too, right? ProSense Jul 2013 #89
Again yes. last1standing Jul 2013 #127
Cool, so you'll allow me my opinion? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #128
I'll not only allow the opinions you express, I'll kick them for you. last1standing Jul 2013 #152
Seriously? I'm trying to avoid taking sides, but you guys are seeing informants in your soup. Arkana Jul 2013 #134
At this point Prosense and I are just needling each other for fun. last1standing Jul 2013 #151
the Obama administration is doing a fine job of making itself look bad lately grasswire Jul 2013 #84
Awww, you poor little thing... RetroLounge Jul 2013 #30
How cute. ProSense Jul 2013 #36
The more I read about Greenwald, the more I really think he's nothing more than a racist Republican Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #50
So you linked to Greenwald when he posted conservative crap but don't now that he doesn't? last1standing Jul 2013 #53
No...I linked to his drone stories. Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #54
Maybe you should read his intro to that column where he talks about his changing beliefs. last1standing Jul 2013 #57
I'm sorry, but I just can't find it in me to even take this guy seriously any more. Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #60
You know, I can actually understand that. last1standing Jul 2013 #64
I stopped Jamaal510 Jul 2013 #67
I never supported him, just a few thing I agreed with Rex Jul 2013 #156
And the NSA still spies on us AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #52
Kind of sad watching you self destruct whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #73
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #75
Welcome to DU. ProSense Jul 2013 #77
ProSense mode number 3. Savannahmann Jul 2013 #81
Oooh, bizarre. ProSense Jul 2013 #83
How do you keep being wrong and missing the point of everything post after post, Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #88
Because you disagree with me? ProSense Jul 2013 #90
How on Earth did you get that idea from his post? NuclearDem Jul 2013 #91
Do you think Tancredo is a racist? Do you agree with Greenwald on "illegal" immigration? ProSense Jul 2013 #94
Why are you asserting I don't like the OP because it's critical of Greenwald? NuclearDem Jul 2013 #98
Because ProSense Jul 2013 #100
Logical fallacy bingo! NuclearDem Jul 2013 #105
LOL! ProSense Jul 2013 #108
Well, let's see! In this thread, we have from you: NuclearDem Jul 2013 #116
My list, you in this thread: pure deflection. ProSense Jul 2013 #118
Greenwald says he no longer holds those views on immigration. Hissyspit Jul 2013 #125
Greenwald says he never supported the Iraq war. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #129
More exclusion and misrepresentation. Hissyspit Jul 2013 #154
Nope. I have no opinion on 90% of the crap you post since most of what you write Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #97
Wow ProSense Jul 2013 #101
Therefore NSA spying on US citizens is a great idea! eridani Jul 2013 #93
"Exemplary logic, that." It's your logic. ProSense Jul 2013 #95
OP states "It's all about the messenger, not the message" n/t eridani Jul 2013 #104
No, OP state: Greenwald defended Tancredo. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #109
And we should care about that because why? eridani Jul 2013 #124
Who said you had to "care"? n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #131
It's called 'deflection' AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #107
That's hilarious, ProSense Jul 2013 #110
Well, when you make threads when you constantly link to yourself NuclearDem Jul 2013 #112
LOL! At least you admit it, even though you're attempting to blame me for your off-topic comments. ProSense Jul 2013 #114
My mother taught me in the first grade AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #113
Why ProSense Jul 2013 #117
Because AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #121
Are you old enough now to realize that ProSense Jul 2013 #133
I'm old enough to realize AgingAmerican Jul 2013 #147
.... DeSwiss Jul 2013 #115
What the hell is that? ProSense Jul 2013 #119
NSA spying is wrong. The Obama admin is wrong on the issue... ram2008 Jul 2013 #123
K & R Scurrilous Jul 2013 #126
DU rec...nt SidDithers Jul 2013 #130
DUers have been had by the forked-tongue opportunist Greenwald. nt BumRushDaShow Jul 2013 #135
Libertarians talk out of UglyGreed Jul 2013 #138
... Scurrilous Jul 2013 #139
Do you work? WilliamPitt Jul 2013 #140
You already PM'd me accusing me of being a paid shill ProSense Jul 2013 #143
So that's a "no." WilliamPitt Jul 2013 #145
K & R! I must have missed this post from yesterday. JaneyVee Jul 2013 #141
OMG AT THIS PARAGRAPH: JaneyVee Jul 2013 #144
He has since recanted those views. nt Hissyspit Jul 2013 #157
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In 2005, Greenwald defend...»Reply #138