Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Happy Whistleblower's Day! Today we celebrate by crucifying Bradley Manning [View all]Catherina
(35,568 posts)23. ACLU statement on Manning verdict
ACLU Comment on Bradley Manning Verdict
July 30, 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: 212-549-2666, media@aclu.org
NEW YORK A military court-martial today found Pfc. Bradley Manning guilty of multiple charges under the Espionage Act for giving classified material to WikiLeaks, but not guilty of aiding the enemy.
"While we're relieved that Mr. Manning was acquitted of the most dangerous charge, the ACLU has long held the view that leaks to the press in the public interest should not be prosecuted under the Espionage Act," said Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. "Since Manning already plead guilty to charges of leaking information which carry significant punishment it seems clear that the government was seeking to intimidate anyone who might consider revealing valuable information in the future."
http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/aclu-comment-bradley-manning-verdict
July 30, 2013
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: 212-549-2666, media@aclu.org
NEW YORK A military court-martial today found Pfc. Bradley Manning guilty of multiple charges under the Espionage Act for giving classified material to WikiLeaks, but not guilty of aiding the enemy.
"While we're relieved that Mr. Manning was acquitted of the most dangerous charge, the ACLU has long held the view that leaks to the press in the public interest should not be prosecuted under the Espionage Act," said Ben Wizner, director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. "Since Manning already plead guilty to charges of leaking information which carry significant punishment it seems clear that the government was seeking to intimidate anyone who might consider revealing valuable information in the future."
http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/aclu-comment-bradley-manning-verdict
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Happy Whistleblower's Day! Today we celebrate by crucifying Bradley Manning [View all]
Catherina
Jul 2013
OP
No one has been nor will be held accountable for the warcrimes in Collateral Murder except Manning
Catherina
Jul 2013
#1
We will not be allowed to live tweet the verdict. Press ability to file will be restrained
Catherina
Jul 2013
#5
If Manning is found not guilty of Aiding the Enemy and guilty of everything else, he faces 154 years
Catherina
Jul 2013
#7
If you've never listened to Manning's statement of why he leaked, you really need to
Catherina
Jul 2013
#9
And Grassley along with Pat Leahy were the two senators that Sibel Edmonds went to as well...
cascadiance
Jul 2013
#12
I'm taking up knitting. Don't want to miss a stitch if the moment ever comes n/t
Catherina
Jul 2013
#31
State Dept: We've seen the #Manning verdict, no comment, we refer you to the Dept of Defense n/t
Catherina
Jul 2013
#16
Pic: Crowd booing each guilty verdict outside US Embassy, chanting "No justice no peace"
Catherina
Jul 2013
#18
Business trusts & strains of fascism. It really is the late 1920s again. n/t
DirkGently
Jul 2013
#19
Wish they could give him the Nobel Peace Prize today to SLAP THE BASTARDS IN THE FACE!
cascadiance
Jul 2013
#20
sentencing trial begins tomorrow. No minimums required, new evidence allowed. Fight is far from over
Catherina
Jul 2013
#22
It is so wrong. The government just confirmed it's not here to serve us, just corporations & the MIC
Catherina
Jul 2013
#26
Glad to read that the first amendment is getting some support... So much attention on the second
midnight
Jul 2013
#29