Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Happy Whistleblower's Day! Today we celebrate by crucifying Bradley Manning [View all]Catherina
(35,568 posts)25. CCR Condemns Manning Verdict, Questions Future of First Amendment
CCR Condemns Manning Verdict, Questions Future of First Amendment
Contact: press@ccrjustice.org
July 30, 2013, New York Today, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) released the following statement in response to the verdict in the trial of Bradley Manning:
While the "aiding the enemy" charges (on which Manning was rightly acquitted) received the most attention from the mainstream media, the Espionage Act itself is a discredited relic of the WWI era, created as a tool to suppress political dissent and antiwar activism, and it is outrageous that the government chose to invoke it in the first place against Manning. Government employees who blow the whistle on war crimes, other abuses and government incompetence should be protected under the First Amendment.
We now live in a country where someone who exposes war crimes can be sentenced to life even if not found guilty of aiding the enemy, while those responsible for the war crimes remain free. If the government equates being a whistleblower with espionage or aiding the enemy, what is the future of journalism in this country? What is the future of the First Amendment?
Mannings treatment, prosecution, and sentencing have one purpose: to silence potential whistleblowers and the media as well. One of the main targets has been our clients, WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, for publishing the leaks. Given the U.S. governments treatment of Manning, Assange should be granted asylum in his home country of Australia and given the protections all journalists and publishers deserve.
We stand in solidarity with Bradley Manning and call for the government to take heed and end its assault on the First Amendment.
The Center for Constitutional Rights represents WikiLeaks and Julian Assange in the U.S. and filed a case challenging the lack of transparency around the Manning trial on behalf of itself and a diverse group of media figures: Glenn Greenwald, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!, The Nation and its national security correspondent Jeremy Scahill, and Wikileaks and its publisher, Julian Assange. Also included are Kevin Gosztola, co-author of Truth and Consequences: The U.S. vs. Bradley Manning and a civil liberties blogger covering the Manning court martial, and Chase Madar, author of The Passion of Bradley Manning and a contributing editor to The American Conservative. Jonathan Hafetz of Seton Hall Law School is co-counsel with CCR in that case, along with Bill Murphy and John J. Connolly of Zuckerman Spaeder LLPs Baltimore office.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Happy Whistleblower's Day! Today we celebrate by crucifying Bradley Manning [View all]
Catherina
Jul 2013
OP
No one has been nor will be held accountable for the warcrimes in Collateral Murder except Manning
Catherina
Jul 2013
#1
We will not be allowed to live tweet the verdict. Press ability to file will be restrained
Catherina
Jul 2013
#5
If Manning is found not guilty of Aiding the Enemy and guilty of everything else, he faces 154 years
Catherina
Jul 2013
#7
If you've never listened to Manning's statement of why he leaked, you really need to
Catherina
Jul 2013
#9
And Grassley along with Pat Leahy were the two senators that Sibel Edmonds went to as well...
cascadiance
Jul 2013
#12
I'm taking up knitting. Don't want to miss a stitch if the moment ever comes n/t
Catherina
Jul 2013
#31
State Dept: We've seen the #Manning verdict, no comment, we refer you to the Dept of Defense n/t
Catherina
Jul 2013
#16
Pic: Crowd booing each guilty verdict outside US Embassy, chanting "No justice no peace"
Catherina
Jul 2013
#18
Business trusts & strains of fascism. It really is the late 1920s again. n/t
DirkGently
Jul 2013
#19
Wish they could give him the Nobel Peace Prize today to SLAP THE BASTARDS IN THE FACE!
cascadiance
Jul 2013
#20
sentencing trial begins tomorrow. No minimums required, new evidence allowed. Fight is far from over
Catherina
Jul 2013
#22
It is so wrong. The government just confirmed it's not here to serve us, just corporations & the MIC
Catherina
Jul 2013
#26
Glad to read that the first amendment is getting some support... So much attention on the second
midnight
Jul 2013
#29