Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama has been offering concessions to the Republicans [View all]snooper2
(30,151 posts)55. A site you frequent often?
http://biasbreakdown.com/category/in-our-own-biased-opinion/
Five controversial (and award-winning) ideas for proactive conservative evolution
At National Review, Jonah Goldberg notes an observation by Friedrich Hayek: It has . . . invariably been the fate of conservatism to be dragged along a path not of its own choosing.
Whether its the fiscal cliff negotiations, entitlement spending, or any other form of government expansion, the progressive agenda steams ahead, dragging and ripping from the ground the constitutional and conservative roots of this country. Conservatives never win on core principles. Our successes only slow the rate of acceleration toward leftist domination.
Goldberg highlights federalism, where each individual state would regain the powers our constitution assigned it, as the path to proactive conservative re-emergence. We agree with the merits of federalism. However, the deck is stacked against that prospect. The federal government has too much leverage over the states.
So whats the roadmap for returning to federalism?
149 years later
As conservatives grow more discouraged about a country that seems to be losing itself, and as millions grow more and more frustrated with the seemingly unbreachable divide between two differing visions for the country, we would do well to revisit the Gettysburg Address, given at a time when a unified country was nothing more than a fanciful dream. In the 21st century, may we continue to fight for a new birth of freedom, a cause our ancestors so nobly advanced.
Five controversial (and award-winning) ideas for proactive conservative evolution
At National Review, Jonah Goldberg notes an observation by Friedrich Hayek: It has . . . invariably been the fate of conservatism to be dragged along a path not of its own choosing.
Whether its the fiscal cliff negotiations, entitlement spending, or any other form of government expansion, the progressive agenda steams ahead, dragging and ripping from the ground the constitutional and conservative roots of this country. Conservatives never win on core principles. Our successes only slow the rate of acceleration toward leftist domination.
Goldberg highlights federalism, where each individual state would regain the powers our constitution assigned it, as the path to proactive conservative re-emergence. We agree with the merits of federalism. However, the deck is stacked against that prospect. The federal government has too much leverage over the states.
So whats the roadmap for returning to federalism?
149 years later
As conservatives grow more discouraged about a country that seems to be losing itself, and as millions grow more and more frustrated with the seemingly unbreachable divide between two differing visions for the country, we would do well to revisit the Gettysburg Address, given at a time when a unified country was nothing more than a fanciful dream. In the 21st century, may we continue to fight for a new birth of freedom, a cause our ancestors so nobly advanced.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When did the choices become 'do nothing' or 'repeat the same failed actions endlessly'?
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#6
They are the choices as presented by the other poster, nice to see you agree with me that
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#11
Let's start with your likely accurate belief that anything he proposes will fail.
Jackpine Radical
Jul 2013
#53
Failing in Congress can be a positive if the American People see Obama standing for them ...
Scuba
Jul 2013
#69
What people tell pollsters about Congressional approval is far different than what they feel ...
Scuba
Jul 2013
#85
I never claimed polls are facts (or not). Discounting the idea that Obama has turned off ....
Scuba
Aug 2013
#89
OMG siding with republcans is evil don't you know. feel free to kick your own thread often lol nt
msongs
Jul 2013
#17
Especially when Obama's determination to implement the TPP shows just how concerned
forestpath
Jul 2013
#44
Since the TPP will pretty much turn US sovereignity over to corporations I don't
forestpath
Jul 2013
#67
The source is Brian Farrington, a cartoonist. His cartoons are retrieved by Google and are
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#59
There's no excuse for it. The point of doing that is to lower the negotiation starting point
Catherina
Jul 2013
#79
Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result . . .
markpkessinger
Jul 2013
#86