Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Brace yourselves: Santorum is leading a wave of stochastic terrorism. Get ready for shootings... [View all]
For those of you unfamiliar with the term "stochastic terrorism", there's a classic diary on Daily Kos that explains it...
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/01/10/934890/-Stochastic-Terrorism:-Triggering-the-shooters?showAll=yes&via=blog_558016
Stochastic terrorism is the use of mass communications to stir up random lone wolves to carry out violent or terrorist acts that are statistically predictable but individually unpredictable.
This is what occurs when Bin Laden releases a video that stirs random extremists halfway around the globe to commit a bombing or shooting.
This is also the term for what Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity, and others do. And this is what led directly and predictably to a number of cases of ideologically-motivated murder similar to the Tucson shootings.
This is what occurs when Bin Laden releases a video that stirs random extremists halfway around the globe to commit a bombing or shooting.
This is also the term for what Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity, and others do. And this is what led directly and predictably to a number of cases of ideologically-motivated murder similar to the Tucson shootings.
Think of it as being like Russian Roulette, because it has a random component - that's what stochastic means. The right-wingers go on their media channels, making all sorts of outrageous statements. Dog whistles, dehumanizing, demonizing. Over and over and over. Because they've got some statisticians, hovering over what resembles actuarial tables, and they know that every time they make such statements, there's a probability that some crazy is going to come out and start shit. Maybe they'll shoot a gynecologist working at Planned Parenthood. Maybe they'll shoot a member of Congress in the face. Maybe they'll make an attempt on President Obama. Or maybe they'll shoot up a Unitarian/Universalist church or a gay bar - where those libruls hang out.
Santorum is putting a bullet in the gun, spinning the cylinder, pointing the gun at us, and pulling the trigger. Click. Try again. Spin. Point. Click. Again. Some time, maybe tomorrow, maybe three years from now, the gun goes BANG! and somebody dies.
Santorum says the Democratic Party is all about homosexuality. Spin. Point. Click.
He says that Obama is not a real Christian... Spin. Point. Click.
He says that women are getting fetal testing to help them get abortions. Ladies... Spin. Point. Click.
When does the gun go off? Nobody knows for sure, but I'm sure the bastards have Vegas-style odds-makers on that job.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brace yourselves: Santorum is leading a wave of stochastic terrorism. Get ready for shootings... [View all]
backscatter712
Feb 2012
OP
Nothing like a good couple of smear terms to raise the tone of an intellectual discussion...
saras
Feb 2012
#3
I think it's a valid point. There are implications to labeling people murderers, etc.
DirkGently
Feb 2012
#4
Does that mean Maxine Waters leads the charge on the Democratic side?
cherokeeprogressive
Feb 2012
#9
Like the way we called out McClurkin, who called us child killers, and that was followed
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2012
#13
If you're averse to 'serious discussion', then I recommend staying away from one,
The Doctor.
Feb 2012
#38
I gave a serious rejoinder. If you choose to ignore that fact that's not my fault
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2012
#39
I didn't, but you ignored my deliberate response and then accused me of ignorance.
The Doctor.
Feb 2012
#42
You say its not difficult to identify the line between incitement and reporting.
onenote
Feb 2012
#62
Knock out Republican's front runners SCREW UP THEIR PRIMARY we'll vote "Ron Paul"
BleedBlueUSA
Feb 2012
#47
No. Ron Paul appeals to low-information liberal and Democratic voters, especially
tblue37
Feb 2012
#51