Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

exboyfil

(18,353 posts)
1. I have not read the textbook
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 07:45 PM
Jul 2013

but I have read the summary portions on the publisher website. In this particular case they may have a point. Christianity is barely mentioned while Islam commands several chapters. Islam is described as the "first global civilization (forgetting Rome). Given that Islam never established a foothold in all of the Americas, most of Asia, most of Europe, Australia, and most of the southern portion of the African continent, it is a ridiculous thing to say.

The European expansion into the Americas is described as an invasion (which it was). No such negative word is used for Islam (which was also an invasion). They use the phrase "spread of Islam" for three different chapters.

They don't even describe Genghis Khan or Timur as invaders. They reserve the word invasion for only the Americas.

http://wps.ablongman.com/long_stearns_wcap_4/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Florida Rep. Ritch Workma...»Reply #1