Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 11:34 PM Jul 2013

Panama tries to arrest CIA agent on Interpol warrant, USA flies him to safety. [View all]

Retired CIA agent Robert Seldon Lady, convicted in absentia in Italy for a rendition/kidnapping operation, is picked up in Panama on an Interpol warrant, hits the news for a day, and then is allowed to fly back to the U.S. where he disappears — and despite the Edward Snowden case, the Washington media doesn’t even blink...

The CIA’s station chief in Milan back in 2003, he had achieved brief notoriety for overseeing a la dolce vita version of extraordinary rendition as part of Washington’s Global War on Terror. His colleagues kidnapped Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, a radical Muslim cleric and terror suspect, off the streets of Milan, and rendered him via U.S. airbases in Italy and Germany to the torture chambers of Hosni Mubarak’s Egypt. Lady evidently rode shotgun on that transfer...

They left behind such a traceable trail of five-star-hotel and restaurant bills, charges on false credit cards, and unencrypted cell phone calls that the Italian government tracked them down, identified them, and charged 23 of them, Lady included, with kidnapping.

Lady fled Italy, leaving behind a multimillion-dollar villa near Turin meant for his retirement. (It was later confiscated and sold to make restitution payments to Nasr.) Convicted in absentia in 2009, Lady received a nine-year sentence (later reduced to six). He had by then essentially vanished after admitting to an Italian newspaper, “Of course it was an illegal operation. But that’s our job. We’re at war against terrorism.”

Last week, the Panamanians picked him up. It was the real world equivalent of a magician’s trick. He was nowhere, then suddenly in custody and in the news, and then — poof again! — he wasn’t. Just 24 hours after the retired CIA official found himself under lock and key, he was flown out of Panama, evidently under the protection of Washington, and in mid-air, heading back to the United States, vanished a second time.

State Department spokesperson Marie Harf told reporters on July 19th, “It’s my understanding that he is in fact either en route or back in the United States.” So there he was, possibly in mid-air heading for the homeland and, as far as we know, as far as reporting goes, nothing more. Consider it the CIA version of a miracle. Instead of landing, he just evaporated.

And that was that. Not another news story here in the U.S.; no further information from government spokespeople on what happened to him, or why the administration decided to extricate him from Panama and protect him from Italian justice. Nor, as far as I can tell, were there any further questions from the media...

In this same period, there was, of course, another man who almost magically disappeared...when it comes to Snowden, official Washington can’t shut up.... The world has repeatedly been lectured from the bully pulpit in our national capital on how necessary his return and trial is to freedom, justice, and global peace. Snowden, it seems, represents the opposite of a magician’s trick. He can’t disappear even when he wants to. Washington won’t let him, not now, not — as officials have made clear — ever. It’s a matter of morality that he faces the law and pays the (already preordained) price for his “crime.” This, in today’s Washington, is what passes for a self-evident truth.

Don’t make the mistake, however, of comparing Washington’s positions on Snowden and Lady and labeling the Obama administration’s words and actions “hypocrisy.” There’s no hypocrisy involved. This is simply the living definition of what it means to exist in a one-superpower world for the first time in history. For Washington, the essential rule of thumb goes something like this: we do what we want; we get to say what we want about what we do; and U.N. ambassadorial nominee Samantha Powers then gets to lecture the world on human rights and oppression.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/07/tom-engelhardt-edward-snowden-vs-robert-seldon-lady-show-how-our-one-superpower-world-works.html
78 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Taking American foreign aid comes with a price. former9thward Jul 2013 #1
Who is taking foreign aid? And how much? What are you talking about? Do you have a link? JDPriestly Jul 2013 #52
Panama is taking it. former9thward Jul 2013 #78
Convicted in absentia and received a 9 year sentence? Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #2
Well, some of you would cheer, and demand that Snowden get to prison now. Savannahmann Jul 2013 #3
I just think convicting people in absentia and sentencing them to prison is absurd Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #5
What about Osama Bin Laden? n/t Hydra Jul 2013 #9
Was Bin Laden ever convicted in US federal court in absentia? Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #11
Back in the bad old days of the Bush Admin, someone told me they had Hydra Jul 2013 #28
ira einhorn was convicted in absentia. also i believe a bunch of supposed terrorists were HiPointDem Jul 2013 #16
I know conviction in absentia happens. That's not my point Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #17
He fled from Italy to avoid prosecution and admitted to the Italian press think Jul 2013 #31
And Snowden fled the US to avoid prosecution Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #32
Yes,it would bother me that a whistleblower would be prosecuted in absentia think Jul 2013 #34
It's a pretty simple legal construct. reusrename Jul 2013 #71
He will, no doubt, receive a generous government pension for his "service." JDPriestly Jul 2013 #55
I may agree with you however... Savannahmann Jul 2013 #29
So you say Lady was tried in absentia because he fled Italy Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #51
So try him in absentia Savannahmann Jul 2013 #57
How would you feel if Snowden was tried and convicted and sentenced to prison in absentia? Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #59
Much better actually. Savannahmann Jul 2013 #62
I'm opposed to black prison sites and torture. Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #64
Exactly, he would be free to speak to the press and the public. reusrename Jul 2013 #73
Anwar Al-Awlaki was tried in absentia in a Yemeni court. OnyxCollie Jul 2013 #44
Did that put a smile on my face? Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #46
What about assassination w/out a trial? OnyxCollie Jul 2013 #47
I'm utterly opposed to summary executions Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #49
Well, you're consistent in your opinion. OnyxCollie Jul 2013 #50
Snowden hasn't been convicted of anything and you want him apprehended Fumesucker Jul 2013 #4
Apprehension is not conviction. I don't think the Federal govt will convict him in absentia. Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #6
I believe Italy has a somewhat different legal system than the US Fumesucker Jul 2013 #8
I'm not familiar with Italian law Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #10
Where did I cheer anything? Fumesucker Jul 2013 #12
Oh trust me....you would throw a shit fit if Snowden was convicted in absentia Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #13
You have more OPs on Snowwald than I have total posts on the entire subject of Snowwald and NSA Fumesucker Jul 2013 #14
Conviction and sentencing of a CIA agent in absentia is OK! Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #15
Where did I say that? Fumesucker Jul 2013 #20
LOL. Where did I say Italy was not a democracy or the Italian govt broke Italian law? Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #23
It has been your contention for some time now that the law is the law Fumesucker Jul 2013 #25
You think you know a lot about me. I'm flattered. I honestly don't even know who you are. Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #30
Oh, you're memorable all right Fumesucker Jul 2013 #33
Thank you again for letting me know my posts are memorable Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #35
It's good to have goals, we all have a purpose in life Fumesucker Jul 2013 #36
So you don't like my posts Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #37
You repeat yourself when you're flustered Fumesucker Jul 2013 #39
You think I'm flustered? Hahahahahaha Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #40
After thinking about it a bit more I may have misjudged you Fumesucker Jul 2013 #43
LOL. You really think you know me. I am honestly flattered Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #45
US courts convict in absentia too. For example, if the defendant skips out on the trial, in some HiPointDem Jul 2013 #21
By the Italian courts, no less. Amanda Knox, anyone? Lady sounds scummy DevonRex Jul 2013 #7
US courts can & do convict people in absentia. also sentence them to life sentences. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #18
And it's stupid and shouldn't happen unless the defendant is present. Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #19
may be. but it's irrelevant to the OP. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #22
My opinion about conviction in absentia is not relevant to the OP.... Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #24
no. you're just engaged in diversion. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #26
LOL Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #27
Nice edit almost 20 minutes after my post Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #41
so what? i wasn't trying to hide it, the times are there for you & everyone else to see. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #42
Way to miss my point. I never said the US didn't convict people in absentia Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #48
i can edit my posts anytime i please. everyone knows you're just diverting. and your HiPointDem Jul 2013 #58
Like I said Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #61
laughingstock HiPointDem Jul 2013 #66
if your aim is to make more people believe the US government & its operatives are just a gang HiPointDem Jul 2013 #67
No...I'm merely point out the hypocrisy emanating from people like yourself Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #70
you're just doing crap diversion like the rest of your gang & i won't engage with it again. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #72
You won't answer my question because it would directly reveal your hypocrisy Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #74
LOL Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #69
The point is that Lady was helped to escape extradition and a trial, yet the US JDPriestly Jul 2013 #53
The hypocrisy I see... Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #56
except no one has been insisting lady return to italy. possibly because the media & government, HiPointDem Jul 2013 #60
Wait? From your OP... Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #63
since you missed the edit: the US protects mass murderers and terrorists from extradition: HiPointDem Jul 2013 #65
You didn't answer my question and instead you posted about Mr. Avila Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #68
Your tax dollars at work. DeSwiss Jul 2013 #38
K & R ~ nt 99th_Monkey Jul 2013 #54
I dont get it. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #75
Rumsfeld and Cheney told us as much n/t malaise Jul 2013 #76
Funny how the "it was war" excuse never holds up during peace time if the premise Baitball Blogger Jul 2013 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Panama tries to arrest CI...