Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)California Mathematicians Develop Equation to Prevent Shootings [View all]
California Mathematicians Develop Equation to Prevent Shootings
Mathematicians say that statistical data shows that gun control is the best option to save lives.
In an attempt to bring a scientific and data-driven approach to the debate surrounding gun control, two mathematicians from the University of California, Irvine have designed an equation based on statistical data that says reducing the availability of guns will reduce shooting deaths in America.
The husband-and-wife team, Dominik Wodarz and Natalia Komarova, used statistical data from existing studies on gun violence to create different measurements for their equation to predict what is the best method to prevent shootings. After plugging in numbers for different situations, the duo came to the conclusion that, at least for one-on-one shootings, gun control is the more beneficial option. Their findings were published on Friday in the journal PLOS ONE.
"We have now developed a scientific framework where we can argue about scientific data and assumptions, rather than having an emotional debate," Wodarz told U.S. News. "The framework has identified exactly what needs to be measured statistically in order to make these predictions."
Wodarz and Komarova evaluated factors such as the number of people who own guns, how many of those people carry a gun with them, and the likelihood that a person could avoid death by using a gun as defense. The team also looked at studies that evaluated the effect of reduced gun availability on the number of guns in the criminal population. Just as a navigation system in a car uses factors such as distance, speed limits and traffic conditions to find the optimal route between two points, the couple used these statistical measurements to devise the most ideal method to prevent firearm deaths.
The husband-and-wife team, Dominik Wodarz and Natalia Komarova, used statistical data from existing studies on gun violence to create different measurements for their equation to predict what is the best method to prevent shootings. After plugging in numbers for different situations, the duo came to the conclusion that, at least for one-on-one shootings, gun control is the more beneficial option. Their findings were published on Friday in the journal PLOS ONE.
"We have now developed a scientific framework where we can argue about scientific data and assumptions, rather than having an emotional debate," Wodarz told U.S. News. "The framework has identified exactly what needs to be measured statistically in order to make these predictions."
Wodarz and Komarova evaluated factors such as the number of people who own guns, how many of those people carry a gun with them, and the likelihood that a person could avoid death by using a gun as defense. The team also looked at studies that evaluated the effect of reduced gun availability on the number of guns in the criminal population. Just as a navigation system in a car uses factors such as distance, speed limits and traffic conditions to find the optimal route between two points, the couple used these statistical measurements to devise the most ideal method to prevent firearm deaths.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/07/26/california-mathematicians-develop-equation-to-prevent-shootings
Study Findings here: http://www.usnews.com/pubfiles/uc-irvine-gun-study.pdf
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's with this "you people"? Let's quit personalizing these debates & return to facts. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#13
Just going by what the authors state. You are welcome to your own interpretations.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#19
You are wrong. I link directly to the pdf of the study and quote directly from the conclusions.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#37
"An armed society is a polite society." [...] widespread free mental health care
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#12
The study suggest justification for more guns- and no guns. They get to have it both ways.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#21
I discussed the facts of the results of the study and used that as a point of departure.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#26
Guns are a problem, but people are a bigger problem. Progressive solutions solve the bigger problem
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#30
Will the GOP legislatures make it illegal for math teachers to talk about crime or trauma...
Kolesar
Jul 2013
#6
Ohio's forensic topic was "crime" when I was a high school junior on the debate team
Kolesar
Jul 2013
#11
It is sketchy. And inconclusive. The op climbs out on limb and tries to pass it off
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#38
Gun ownership is up, concealed carry is way up, gun accidents and gun homicides are down.
GreenStormCloud
Jul 2013
#35
We weren't supposed to notice either the "guns for all" option or the altered title.
friendly_iconoclast
Jul 2013
#44
Critics will immediately zero in on the mathematicians' foreign sounding names.
Quantess
Jul 2013
#46