Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: California Mathematicians Develop Equation to Prevent Shootings [View all]geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)25. Nice cherry pick.
In an effort to present a more honest reperesentation:
This paper provides the first mathematical formulation to
analyze the tradeoff in the relationship between legal gun
availability and the rate of firearm-induced death: while more
wide-spread legal gun availability can increase the number of gunmediated attacks and thus the firearm-induced death rate, gun
ownership might also protect potential victims when attacked by
an armed offender, and thus reduce the firearm-induced death
rate. The main contributions of this study are as follows. (1) We
created a mathematical model which takes account of several
factors that are often discussed in the context of gun-induced
homicide. The model is based on a set of assumptions that are
supported by previously published empirical data, as was discussed
in detail.
The model suggests that the rate of firearm-induced homicides can be
minimized either by a ban of private firearm possession, or by
the legal availability of guns for everyone, depending on the
parameter values. While there is strong indication that the model
assumptions and hence the properties are consistent with data, it
will be important to collect more data to back up the underlying
assumptions more strongly.
Dependence of the Firearm-Related Homicide Rate on Gun Availability: A Mathematical Analysis
Also, please link to the source of your excerpt.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What's with this "you people"? Let's quit personalizing these debates & return to facts. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#13
Just going by what the authors state. You are welcome to your own interpretations.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#19
You are wrong. I link directly to the pdf of the study and quote directly from the conclusions.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#37
"An armed society is a polite society." [...] widespread free mental health care
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#12
The study suggest justification for more guns- and no guns. They get to have it both ways.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#21
I discussed the facts of the results of the study and used that as a point of departure.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#26
Guns are a problem, but people are a bigger problem. Progressive solutions solve the bigger problem
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#30
Will the GOP legislatures make it illegal for math teachers to talk about crime or trauma...
Kolesar
Jul 2013
#6
Ohio's forensic topic was "crime" when I was a high school junior on the debate team
Kolesar
Jul 2013
#11
It is sketchy. And inconclusive. The op climbs out on limb and tries to pass it off
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#38
Gun ownership is up, concealed carry is way up, gun accidents and gun homicides are down.
GreenStormCloud
Jul 2013
#35
We weren't supposed to notice either the "guns for all" option or the altered title.
friendly_iconoclast
Jul 2013
#44
Critics will immediately zero in on the mathematicians' foreign sounding names.
Quantess
Jul 2013
#46