Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Detroit: The new hipster mecca [View all]RKP5637
(67,112 posts)35. Yeah, I see it as a good thing. ... it's a spark to maybe get the city moving again. The
entire topology of the US is changing IMO ... where it's all headed I have no idea, but to me a spark of interest in a city that really bit bad times is a good thing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gentrification. Let's push out all of the poor minorities and replace them with white 20 somethings.
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2013
#1
a lot of them are living off their trust funds, though. as you can verify by researching some of
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#4
My concern is with the tried and true method of displacing the poor and white washing...
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2013
#9
Haven't you already suffered enough in these discussions? With your beacon of hope...
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2013
#13
Lots of blacks in Renton area. Lots. And the Sound area around Tacoma is almost half black.
ErikJ
Jul 2013
#14
detroit has a higher population density than portland oregon. it's not rotting for lack of people.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#41
The issue is displacing the poor, not with them possibly leaving in the future.
Gravitycollapse
Aug 2013
#65
if he doesn't live there his concern rings shallow? how's that? (and how do you 'ring shallow'
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#17
What do you mean nothing was there? Was there literally no people at all in these areas?
Gravitycollapse
Jul 2013
#12
Wow are you ignorant. There are 1000's of acres of open fields in Detoit now dummy.
ErikJ
Jul 2013
#15
yeah, it's across the street from empty wayne state university. acres and acres of emptiness.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#19
there was nothing there in the neighborhood of the detroit arts institute? what? it's right across
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#18
I still don't get why you are angry, or rather against, that some outsiders decided
WCGreen
Aug 2013
#55
I am not against outsiders moving into detroit. i am not even against hipsters moving to detroit.
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#56
There are no fewer poor people. What you are describing as revitalization is just a shifting around
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#58
i imagine there are lots of people who would move to detroit if they could find jobs. but since
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#53
right. they're going to turn off the electricity in the neighborhoods surrounding michigan's 3rd-
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#20
This >>> "decades of deindustrialization are the main culprit." As with much of
RKP5637
Jul 2013
#27
cities change, demographically, industry etc etc. once the slide starts people leave
loli phabay
Jul 2013
#30
Yeah, I see it as a good thing. ... it's a spark to maybe get the city moving again. The
RKP5637
Jul 2013
#35
the city *is* moving, and it's not because of hipsters. hipsters do jack. they are a symptom,
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#36
This is true. The well-connected players are beginning to circle the feed trough.
susanna
Aug 2013
#63
no. they didn't move to depressed 'areas,' they moved to low-rent neighborhoods in otherwise
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#42
lots of them are just ordinary people. but an 'arts scene' is always made by the wealthy.
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#66