Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PhD Thesis on DU and Free Republic [View all]Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)85. very interesting RD
"The conservative view is that family should do these things"
I think this approach to helping those in need actually does work in very small setting. I saw first hand how it worked in West, TX. I see it work in small communities where people know each other. They go to the same churches, shop in the same stores, and have children who go to school together. But, it is a very narrow world view. It could never work in LA or NYC where the wealthy and the poor rarely mingle except on a busy street.
What troubles me is that in the past, these people looked at the masses in need with indifference. Now they look with utter disdain. They no longer think "Pull yourself up by your bootstraps", "Deal with it," as you say. They say they are all "on the take" and are bilking the system and that they are having to pay for it. I hear it all the time. Hell, even Romney echoed it in his 47% remarks.
How did this change in attitude happen? I think this is extraordinarily interesting to dissect. Was it a master plan the PTB hatched? Although I have no proof I have to believe it was. And I also have to believe that the Limbaughs of the world played a major role. I also think that the Bush economic downturn caused by a raping by the rich did as well. They noticed it was harder to make ends meet - and it was easy to make them think it was someone else's fault.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I definitely picked up more sympathy for DU than Freepville in what I've read
Pretzel_Warrior
Jul 2013
#9
Um, that Appendix is not the author's writing; she's just including a post by a DU'er.
snot
Jul 2013
#11
I'm definitely bookmarking this. I read quite a bit but will get back to it
Pretzel_Warrior
Jul 2013
#7
The mispelled word was 'moron', spelled 'moran' on the sign. It has now become legend
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#53
I'll read it later.. fascinating. "If we could see ourselves as others see us."
mountain grammy
Jul 2013
#39
I find this creepy, frankly. Yeah, yeah, "Internet." Still, one would prefer to think of this board
WinkyDink
Jul 2013
#55
I know it's about content - but that first sentence...surely it's not gramatically correct
Laura PourMeADrink
Jul 2013
#64
Thanks RainDog...of course I should have looked it up myself. I guess
Laura PourMeADrink
Jul 2013
#69
Well, I since 2004, I have NEVER seen anyone show two sides of anything. It is always just OUR
Laura PourMeADrink
Jul 2013
#79
We, the left, and all variations, have goodness on our side. When you strip away all the politics
Laura PourMeADrink
Jul 2013
#81