Supreme Court says prison inmates don’t have to be read rights in different investigations [View all]

[morningfog]

By Associated Press, Published: February 21

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said Tuesday investigators don’t have to read Miranda rights to inmates during jailhouse interrogations about crimes unrelated to their current incarceration.

The high court, on a 6-3 vote, overturned a federal appeals court decision throwing out prison inmate Randall Lee Fields’ conviction, saying Fields was not in “custody” as defined by Miranda and therefore did not have to have his rights read to him.

“Imprisonment alone is not enough to create a custodial situation within the meaning of Miranda,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the court’s majority opinion.

Three justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor, dissented and said the court’s decision would limit the rights of prisoners.

“Today, for people already in prison, the court finds it adequate for the police to say: ‘You are free to terminate this interrogation and return to your cell,’” Ginsburg said in her dissent. “Such a statement is no substitute for one ensuring that an individual is aware of his rights.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts-law/supreme-court-says-prison-inmates-dont-have-to-be-read-rights-in-different-investigations/2012/02/21/gIQA3ddDRR_story.html