Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy, oversight hearing on surveillance programs [View all]Zorra
(27,670 posts)15. "we need to examine how to prevent this type of breach in the future."
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
"Just recently, the Director of National Intelligence acknowledged that he provided false testimony about the NSA surveillance programs during a Senate hearing in March, and his office had to remove a fact sheet from its website after concerns were raised about its accuracy."
So, Snowden is the bad guy because he exposed illegal acts, corruptions, lies, deceit, blatant breech of public trust, etc.
Concerns that desperately needed to be addressed that would never have been exposed otherwise, because Snowden had nowhere else to go except to an investigative journalist with his concerns...
[font color="red" size="10" face="face"]BECAUSE HE KNEW HE COULD NOT TRUST ANYONE IN THE GOVERNMENT TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM[/font]
"Just recently, the Director of National Intelligence acknowledged that he provided false testimony about the NSA surveillance programs during a Senate hearing in March, and his office had to remove a fact sheet from its website after concerns were raised about its accuracy."
"Just recently, the Director of National Intelligence acknowledged that he provided false testimony about the NSA surveillance programs during a Senate hearing in March, and his office had to remove a fact sheet from its website after concerns were raised about its accuracy."
So, Snowden is the bad guy because he exposed illegal acts, corruptions, lies, deceit, blatant breech of public trust, etc.
Concerns that desperately needed to be addressed that would never have been exposed otherwise, because Snowden had nowhere else to go except to an investigative journalist with his concerns...
[font color="red" size="10" face="face"]BECAUSE HE KNEW HE COULD NOT TRUST ANYONE IN THE GOVERNMENT TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM[/font]
"Just recently, the Director of National Intelligence acknowledged that he provided false testimony about the NSA surveillance programs during a Senate hearing in March, and his office had to remove a fact sheet from its website after concerns were raised about its accuracy."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy, oversight hearing on surveillance programs [View all]
ProSense
Jul 2013
OP
Wheels Within The Wheels Within The Wheels Have Never Been Your Strong Suit, Ma'am
The Magistrate
Jul 2013
#32
He may not condone the way it was disclosed, but if it hadn't been the "discussion" wouldn't
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2013
#9
"Funny"? Did chosing to "highlight" that point prevent you from reading the entire statement?
ProSense
Jul 2013
#12
Well, since the crux of your beef with Snowden is that he didn't use official channels
NuclearDem
Jul 2013
#29