Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy, oversight hearing on surveillance programs [View all]BumRushDaShow
(169,553 posts)35. I doubt he and most of the rest of them
understand what happens down at the packet level and the OSI model, etc., the problem being that it can cause eyes to glaze over and that's how stuff gets missed.
What was the latest tech 10 years ago is ancient today. The fact that cell phone calls were considered exempt from the 4th amendment is a case in point of a big FAIL. But we shall see.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy, oversight hearing on surveillance programs [View all]
ProSense
Jul 2013
OP
Wheels Within The Wheels Within The Wheels Have Never Been Your Strong Suit, Ma'am
The Magistrate
Jul 2013
#32
He may not condone the way it was disclosed, but if it hadn't been the "discussion" wouldn't
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2013
#9
"Funny"? Did chosing to "highlight" that point prevent you from reading the entire statement?
ProSense
Jul 2013
#12
Well, since the crux of your beef with Snowden is that he didn't use official channels
NuclearDem
Jul 2013
#29