General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For all you people who seek attention with nothing good to say about Obama.... [View all]Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)When you refer to those who 'lack sanctity', do you include those who are declared 'not true progressives' if they don't agree with your views?
Would you agree that there is a difference between valid criticism and 'bashing'?
"As always, you are welcome to go to the Obama Group, where all agree with him 100% all the time. They oppose what he opposes, one assumes."
Did it ever occur to you that you assume wrongly?
"You should remain in that restricted echo chamber of xerox like minds if discussion is upsetting to you."
Do you not find it a bit odd that those who support a Democratic president on a Democratic website are told they should restrict their postings to a small 'group', rather than being permitted to voice their opinions as part of the wider community that posts here?
My observation is that the 'echo chamber of xerox like minds' works both ways. There are those who decry lock-stepping, while lock-stepping themselves in their own little echo chamber of anti-Obama rhetoric, despite their cries that they are of independent mind.
But, as you say, "to each his own". It's an interesting concept which, IMHO, should include all opinions, not just those you personally agree with. And suggesting that Obama supporters should keep to their own little niche sounds rather like the 'extreme intolerance' of which you speak.